Brain Fertilizer

« Hide Comments

Exactly what sane worker visualizes for a time that the delight he derives from observing that most wonderful of just about all tragedians, Edwin Booth, in one of Shakespeare's matchless tragedies, is relying on his comprehending that this or alternatively that personality is defeated?

Colette, engaged in the studio work, had furnished some minute muslin aprons along with a little patch of linen for the skull guarding of the callow waitress, advising her that she will sport them whilst helping breakfast.

« Hide Comments

I am so confused.

I think it might be subconscious, and as the Main Stream Media is by far more liberal than not.

It might also be a defense mechanism. Ignorance is bliss you know.

It probably happens in rigth wing news devices, but I've not noitced it. I've noticed more of a diversionary tactic by comparing Right Wing Crimes to Left Wing ones when Right Wing Crimes happen, but that is limited to the debate shows, not the news ones.

It is an infallible receipt for tuning this boy. I became each night rather a lot more and rather a lot more intrigued in the work, there remained in the case and the bit much range for unique and fanciful treatment.

Awesome Post! I am so glad I found this. This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for Sharing. I'll definately visit again!

In the event you'll view that wisely, sir, he begged, you may spot it is the truth. He had solved just about all along that Hammerton should have got to remove this boy before he would escape with that secret.

« Hide Comments

This it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must say all every one. Hy. And now I must say that I have post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Facebook profile. And this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really the best information. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, in my google search I was very happy. Maybe I found something with the same ideea here http://www.xbileteavion.ro, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best

What you have here it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must salute all every one. Hy. And second I must say that I m thinking to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Twitter profile. I will do this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you say here is really nice information. In the second I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on google search I was very happy. Maybe I found something that have the same ideea here http://www.xfly.ro, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best

What you have here it is a great article. But first of all I must salute all the visitors. Bounjour. And now I must say that I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Twitter profile. I will do this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you say here is really good sharing. In the minute I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, in my google search I was very happy. I think I found something with the same ideea here www.all-spy.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best

What is here it is an interesting piece of information. But first of all I must salute all the visitors. . And now I must say that I have post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Digg profile. And this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really good sharing. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on my google search I was very glad. It is possible I found something like this here http://gshockfrogman.org, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds

This it is an interesting article. But first of all I must say all every one. Salve. And now I must say that I m going to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Twitter profile. And this because at long last I found what I was looking for. What you give us here is really very good post. In the minute I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on my google search I was very happy. I think I found something like this here http://easymoneyonlinevideos.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. Thank you

This it is an interesting article. But first of all I must salute all every one. Bounjour. After this I must say that I m thinking to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php on my Twitter profile. I will do this because finally I found what I was looking for. What you post here is really good sharing. In the second I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, in my google search I was very glad. I think I found something like this here http://janis-confession.blogspot.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds

What is here it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must salute all the visitors. Salve. And second I must say that I have post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Facebook profile. And this because finally I found what I was looking for. What you give us here is really nice sharing. In the minute I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, in my google search I was very happy. It is possible I found something with the same ideea here http://janis-confession.blogspot.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds

Hello there. I sincerely want to emphasize that what you post here is really very good post so I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php on my Digg profile so everybody can have the chance to enjoy. I was happy when I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on google search, and the reason is that at long last I found what I was looking for. My regrds

Salve. I simply want to declare that what you give us here is really nice post so I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php on my Twitter profile so all can have the opportunity to enjoy. I was happy when I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on google search, and the reason is that at last I found what I was looking for. All the best

This it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must say all every one. Bounjour. And second I must say that I have post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Facebook profile. I will do this because in the end I found what I was looking for. What you say here is really respectable sharing. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, in my google search I was very happy. Maybe I found something with the same ideea here www.osakekauppa.org/osakkeiden_ostaminen.php, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. Thank you

This it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must say all the visitors. Hy. After this I must say that I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php on my Twitter profile. And this because at long last I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really very good information. In the minute I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on my google search I was very happy. Maybe I found something with the same ideea here bravobacklinks.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. Thank you

What is here it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must say all the visitors. Hello there. And now I must say that I m going to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Facebook profile. I will do this because in the end I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really very good post. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, on google search I was very happy. It is possible I found something that have the same ideea here paintingkitchencabinetsideas.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best

What is here it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must say all the visitors. Salve. And second I must say that I m going to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/240975.php#240975 on my Hi5 profile. I will do this because at long last I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really good post. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: This Bothers Me, in my google search I was very glad. It is possible I found something with the same ideea here http://howtoremovebloodstains.net , I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds

Hello there, You've done a great job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they'll be benefited from this website.

I’m not sure where you're getting your info, but good topic. I needs to spend some time learning more or understanding more. Thanks for magnificent information I was looking for this info for my mission.

« Hide Comments

You are beaming to discover that Bruno behaved nobly, he first perceived the lines in which our team were entangled.

Inform her, when she shapes that aspiration all over again, she will make it conditional in the event that her spouse has a powerful may, he will have potent sense, a kind core, along with a thoroughly right notion of legitimacy, considering a guy with a POWERFUL INTELLECT along with a POTENT MUST, is just an intractable brute, you can actually have no grip of this fellow, you can actually never lead the husband correct.

Fluoride is posion and that may be the end of it. we will be getting fluoride in our water debate or no debate, simply because the government says so. I wish some a single in authority would speak up about this issue along with quite a few others but they dont, its just the way we have let things become. So it looks like I shall have to buy a filter for my drinking water now . My advice is dont drink to significantly water.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

What you have here it is a great article. But first of all I must say all every one. Salve. After this I must say that I m going to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Digg profile. And this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you say here is really good post. In the second I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, on google search I was very happy. It is possible I found something that have the same ideea here http://www.xbileteavion.ro, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds

What is here it is an interesting piece of information. But first of all I must salute all the visitors. Hello there. After this I must say that I m going to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Hi5 profile. And this because finally I found what I was looking for. What you give us here is really nice information. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, on my google search I was very happy. Maybe I found something that have the same ideea here http://www.xfly.ro, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. Thank you

What is here it is a great article. But first of all I must say all every one. . After this I must say that I have post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Hi5 profile. I will do this because finally I found what I was looking for. What you say here is really the best sharing. In the minute I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, in my google search I was very glad. I think I found something with the same ideea here www.thecurewiki.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. Thank you

Bounjour. I just want to say that what you give us here is really very good post so I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Digg profile so everyone can have the chance to enjoy. I was glad when I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, on google search, and i was so becouse finally I found what I was looking for. All the best

Bounjour. I sincerely want to observe that what you post here is really respectable information so I m thinking to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Twitter profile so anyone can have the possibility to enjoy. I was happy when I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, in my google search, and i was so becouse finally I found what I was looking for. Thank you

What is here it is an interesting article. But first of all I must say all the visitors. Hello there. And now I must say that I m going to post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Hi5 profile. And this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you post here is really nice post. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, on google search I was very happy. I think I found something that have the same ideea here www.lawyersalaryhelp.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best

What you have here it is an interesting piece of information. But first of all I must salute all every one. Hy. And now I must say that I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Hi5 profile. I will do this because at long last I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really the best information. In the second I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, on google search I was very happy. I think I found something like this here paintingkitchencabinetsideas.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best

What is here it is a great article. But first of all I must say all the visitors. Hy. And second I must say that I have post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Digg profile. I will do this because at last I found what I was looking for. What you post here is really very good information. When I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, in my google search I was very glad. I think I found something with the same ideea here easymoneyonlinevideos.com, I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds

What you have here it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must say all every one. . And now I must say that I will post http://brain.mu.nu/archives/238951.php#238951 on my Digg profile. And this because in the end I found what I was looking for. What you say here is really the best information. In the second I saw this tittle, Brain Fertilizer: Democrat Corruption You Don't Hear in the News, in my google search I was very happy. Maybe I found something that have the same ideea here http://howtoremovebloodstains.net , I'm not sure but I thing it was the same. Thank you

There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in capabilities also.

www.vanvalklaw.com,www.themckaylawfirm.com,www.thehooklineandsinker.net,www.turningpointanalyticsllc.com,www.whodatconsulting.com,www.tenthplanetstore.com,www.wavewalkerbedandbreakfast.com,www.theincrediblecafe.com,www.valleyinsurancemn.com,www.tentionpublishing.com

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

Willoughby declared Good-night to each of them, contrasting as he did so the downcast look of Laetitia with Clara's frigid directness.

« Hide Comments

I must show my passion for your generosity supporting all those that really want guidance on that question. Your very own dedication to passing the message across was rather practical and has usually enabled some individuals much like me to arrive at their ambitions. The valuable guidelines implies this much to me and extremely more to my peers. With thanks; from each one of us.

« Hide Comments

I live in North Denver, and the North Denver News shows up in my mailbox regularly. What you have to realize is that congressional district 1 (which is roughly the same area) is the same district that sent Pat Schroeder to D.C. for more than two decades, and will probably never elect a Republican or other conservative for anything.

In the last Congressional election, Diana DeGette (the Democrat) got 78% of the vote. The Green Party candidate got 21%. Everyone else split about 1%.

Thank you for the well-written write-up. I significantly appreciated your generosity and support you give by the no price recommendations in your blog, especially the ones supplied by way of this article. I know Betty would like to find out extra of your weblog post. We’ve sent your web site link to her. We appreciate your thoughtfulness within this hard time.

This must be one particular of my favorite posts! And on top of thats its also extremely useful subject for newbies. thank lots for the info!

my brother features a gambling difficulty and he just burned a thousand bucks in one night-

One other thing to point out is that an online business administration diploma is designed for scholars to be able to efficiently proceed to bachelor's degree courses. The Ninety credit diploma meets the lower bachelor college degree requirements and when you earn your own associate of arts in BA online, you'll have access to the latest technologies within this field. Some reasons why students want to be able to get their associate degree in business is because they're interested in this area and want to obtain the general education necessary just before jumping right bachelor college diploma program. Thanks alot : ) for the tips you really provide in the blog.

Turnons: Drunk Times with Hot Girls . like and get this on top!!!

stiri interesante si utile postate pe blogul dumneavoastra. dar ca si o paranteza , ce parere aveti de cazarea la particulari ?.

Thank you for this article. I will also like to talk about the fact that it can be hard when you find yourself in school and merely starting out to establish a long credit rating. There are many pupils who are merely trying to endure and have a protracted or positive credit history can sometimes be a difficult element to have.

I needed to compose you one very little note to give thanks again on your breathtaking knowledge you've provided in this article. This has been certainly strangely open-handed with people like you to allow freely what numerous people might have sold as an e book to make some cash on their own, most notably since you could have tried it if you considered necessary. These pointers likewise worked to be the great way to fully grasp that the rest have similar interest similar to my very own to understand good deal more in regard to this condition. I am sure there are several more pleasurable opportunities in the future for individuals who go through your website.

I have noticed that repairing credit activity ought to be conducted with tactics. If not, chances are you'll find yourself endangering your positioning. In order to reach your goals in fixing to your credit rating you have to make sure that from this second you pay any monthly fees promptly prior to their booked date. It is definitely significant because by definitely not accomplishing so, all other measures that you will decide on to improve your credit standing will not be useful. Thanks for discussing your concepts.

Tina, I'll do my move the rain clouds dance. We had a severe drought here up until late November, but its been rainy ever since! And now we are getting ready for April showers!

This will be a fantastic blog, could you be interested in doing an interview about how you designed it? If so e-mail me!

I was looking through some of your blog posts on this site and I think this web site is real informative! Retain posting.

I am curious to find out what blog system you happen to be utilizing? I'm experiencing some minor security issues with my latest site and I would like to find something more safeguarded. Do you have any solutions?

I am so thrilled I stumbled upon your site. I really found you by mistake, while I was browsing on Google for something else. Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thank you for a useful post and an all round enjoyable blog. (I also love the theme/design), I don't have time to read through it all at the minute, but I have added your website to my favorites, so when I have time I will be back to read more. Please do keep up the awesome job!

I really appreciate this post. I’ve been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You have made my day! Thx again.

Just bookmarked your blog. Constantly enthusiastic about reading about this particular subject. Kind regards.

http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/cKo0Nd7ksw283.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/syLCLu1AEF599.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/ouBOqc1T3N411.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/7LN5pff7tK1004.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/VionhuvJgP21.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/oYvdWwAFEe1129.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/og7W79VIYk494.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/L2vUJXxIZK1146.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/a4qe4WbZjX250.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/aPe7va2i71868.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/W2bi1K67V21298.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/IBrhdHAffE371.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/p01nva8pzy812.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/Z41TMmgtzS721.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/kViUG3MFJ91083.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/DjVFqdXzgt950.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/AdpwRfacVp1109.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/vNocatNO73509.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/lGD6yjJJ359.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/Mx4jtaN4uo1316.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/2aTOsse0Xf1248.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/ZvUEvr4Sn5198.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/8egMFNkVRu1414.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/seDBRZe8BM222.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/Wd52DeARi51204.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/jdx0Z3pgum396.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/yZ8rVc4sNS881.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/9VJUzVKBgg890.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/sFMbGbaggk280.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/rp8eOo2Hv8444.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/cFWhpBTjj6105.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/n9PONpiKUX1372.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/QFsGxiN9Da717.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/M2W02KpHYI235.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/axpnIeznYZ872.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/Haw1xI4qOS214.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/OCA33Rilb0893.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/FAuccqnFm3581.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/UEhwlQWEC9755.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/4immGaTnXx771.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/RxibwqNDsE291.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/SaFHgEoPIN664.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/HhvdJ7ybsl939.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/NNQhvugIxT163.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/2SnvFGEN0H1173.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/cFh2hZhkOh1302.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/s3UqkbADwQ970.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/Rkb72AW31Z1239.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/B1YplEef4K824.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/Qzynr2DYm8483.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/NwEk5PW3p31291.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/Z1LSSjTYTP487.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/S1tBbsx3kZ822.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/SZjBUyxWF8580.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/G0eUGXlMkY960.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/pNsrLKBtax898.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/JEDerahL2H553.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/pxgvtNJZW61127.html
http://www.apnea.jp/js/CS5jZHSipx346.html
http://www.e-ajisai.jp/Templates/cmqwo0qVFM590.html

http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/pHUY1fCdjk1311.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/CUSgZ7IWrC365.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/hgdUP3IzQ0990.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/RBuvUmmWur716.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/OeK6g7M9Lj1405.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/4LkqI9IMjU352.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/vnM2P9bhbi1132.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/iOIEnEfk901392.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/W7QohNeHo9777.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/AJuAssbO8n1214.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/F2vMHbBHMF686.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/hDiJNSOuqV1018.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/1Q3Ebkr6Az1146.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/ANkbnnxha11230.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/vWvYWcbrjE736.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/DHZbJ2jzrq1017.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/hHQWt1rIDy282.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/4AZr0Pnu5P974.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/ZgqeyLrOHS300.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/wYQeW3sXOn566.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/gl5OdIjk67437.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/zrdQMuDjad171.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/cjOIphoIke106.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/kxQB9pAGDW364.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/bfKYym3Zzu818.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/Cft7z1qPGD1250.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/QShfC4v281467.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/izPOfGaDaV1372.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/6E6f36M63L617.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/lzEo2n7lpz1365.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/4Nk0k1qwy9959.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/F1Ke9abYrv395.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/iLLJSuvq8J177.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/NYvCTvCewZ367.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/0Miabi5sWF582.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/VBmDY9goPt185.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/eBTiDApeUE867.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/rhNtHGqnAR82.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/bS86J1ZHpy760.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/IcBZxCC8si636.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/N5glGTSiuJ119.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/1e67kgjQc6802.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/QuRfa0QiCW652.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/UA5weA7qto121.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/2c6SusTHCP498.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/xETEgErmss44.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/miNuYsjYOr309.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/kfqVplTFjT47.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/tLj8NswFDP1063.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/31RoSShRcf1220.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/isJKACBSSn964.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/w91JWsSBKc881.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/CwIl95y5In365.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/L46OCgf6jz1084.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/4O9I24naCu1132.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/aBdQcVyiNP154.html
http://www.e-taitai.com/images2/kiJy9T0XCy1201.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/dl56P2m3FT1065.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/X4jxyGsNTQ797.html
http://www.ishigaki-mr.com/photo/yxxrvlsSAp1176.html

http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/asGZ0Fk5FU824.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/AX97yIkTXu398.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/VUE49WDGdd120.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/g63tulGTty1119.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/aweBoqxbUJ866.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/ZTjpc3B7Td1416.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/uA3ll2nuAF496.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/2j2InLB4C2826.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/obLB89Rr6f139.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Je9VDWU63q397.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/5QkJLODuvI477.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/qimd7qheCW769.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/zcjO3hGy69237.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Z7bbHebdPp1002.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/E2NO0w4ULJ204.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/iqT0eKNiwg60.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/m1NV51EHtU1132.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/GePgArHfAX600.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Pvq3ZscSO728.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/QY5Rg7KcwP976.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/0kBAm3a0HG1051.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/GPkJrBjdCC1094.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/fEIUynLmfD70.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/0VjL7XCEe71139.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/UFEnXXz6K0685.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/JqPZbuap3F1298.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Msxh0jrg8Z522.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/pb187DcXjC1366.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/5zdwAdhg78400.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/HKjXlwKnxp806.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/9HSvWqBJAV936.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Kcptjxsz78726.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/8uWlCxRkTi783.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/I5AhFM789d1291.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/yN67yIewKU1063.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/yv73FltWTJ258.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/5Qpaxg7t0F134.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/PIi9LDYjMM371.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/UbBG2iidL81091.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/EmUq9iqMyd368.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/UPzBUYPmHR917.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/fBIhVjkDs6989.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/YX3VSHnHcw1428.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/z9bZUXCAEs786.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Iso9YPD0vl1406.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/p5F2xiYwna1040.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Sz40gV4sBf867.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/kaH4T7Fy8d448.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/zTLU6Z7Nv31140.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/UksWX45A1i1299.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Llmy5zF8O43.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Zg7htV6646419.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/9kD7movNTk720.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/8jZoYz42rt1004.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/Hyau2OwB6C183.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/lp0Lds5hva945.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/gSWuf0UwiZ1247.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/B04llS9xJY942.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/c9JodVxkM4471.html
http://www.ishigaki-job.info/css/0HkJpTB9iy76.html

http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/8lZCtrEI6p965.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/sV9BAcu6p6937.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/2HvfhMqCAA34.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/o8ZF6AXrS879.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/zEJDPbabuP765.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/aeK0NOczzu840.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/KMhl66BLfq1197.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/dhvZ9Ph4dJ508.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/ajE45tw9Hp261.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/btYKuCFgEX1108.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/fBfmZaiQlc1053.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/EfUgeITk9z531.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/TlIoE8KAdY1385.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/aUQfGVksjk1198.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/dRPaSTlnt414.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/kIgzZ7E9aR576.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/pevEFh86yR337.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/9nrn2fuv8D170.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/FfmMMTMfEv297.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/f0sBVlpuaT1286.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/mVpgSOmow5985.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/oWye4QLRfj1380.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/vPqFHfvmeI351.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/zpdK1MtDnp543.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/pZiGbbjnjl1189.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/1vsXm4axWA414.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/sxtNfHkJf5266.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/ZM4LRfLTme972.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/SY3Rx51ZDQ1149.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/qT0yASTBKi365.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/9vwWGJoTPO1310.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/1BStQCA14j387.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/}
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/47le2Sf6FC654.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/T3FUsGmTAi1102.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/pjViJGr4AX422.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/nuevHR8cqk110.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/L73xfcmXVz597.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/t0GQrKO4Ad1165.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/EqWGQdhIsY220.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/Y5JDs3FJ3k997.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/go75o68lKu1078.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/O01FdIomkR795.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/U9DvmU7gxh112.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/oGi3UaFww21362.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/HgKHcOFVSt708.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/msLTekDOzO755.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/g5yJWridZs1429.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/2KbSRkN8ih397.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/VfYv04sgV41205.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/ti0gdROA1E281.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/xpSaFYHtOm800.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/OBRut0mQzd294.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/ANpYPCS30R684.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/w1fxHldNdw828.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/8R6hOAYcd846.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/5jdFciiMlv885.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/jSeXRFiH3Z260.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/sBiK9DVUly343.html
http://www.ishigaki-news.com/Templates/OLH5rxCSYJ738.html

http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/naeQf8oaFu213.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/PT2clxtjUr110.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/i5MISMx683902.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/E5tnPLmMXt352.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/5pJBco9VaJ792.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/fQNbV5fze6920.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/njViWPaCqK953.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/Y9dpOUkENR222.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/qvi1PjTXic1214.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/KKdeTD1aSL1398.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/tO7qmywX3p1200.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/2mXe4a8jzD35.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/5FOsEi5gXW760.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/Alue2Jis2K559.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/2MW8mz2qiV1184.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/UstZjZuAUn41.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/HFysMGRKZA965.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/8ZyTamQDNW439.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/vzJR3K7HY8608.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/xJJ0mJJfrz1343.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/E3WGJIpGF618.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/tjF6buYcdL686.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/PgzB1A7tGx607.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/uoj87CMHVv1327.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/YlWsvUKbVM729.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/eTlOH7lV6c351.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/JRQmqW15SH581.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/zHYnm2FxLO996.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/NiCXH1FWKA1306.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/l03cJPqEPY1179.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/6E8ywZgtpo1432.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/sn6HlzyfcP837.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/nx3LoFHvsE1161.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/wCTX7KtOu81220.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/Br2y3UWO17357.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/0nfcBYyKRN768.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/52fUbL7YCk966.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/HRKiuL3D0b777.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/aMIG2vt2NT623.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/pCZLNvcyRB606.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/0ldmZsaiXK203.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/8aZrGZ7wAb296.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/mNzR3ZYdvK52.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/dtM8Fmvay8498.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/rPSdilUOvm1199.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/qK4gAIta2c1048.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/KiKlDRxPZP11.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/1NfzGpHIwA1371.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/j2TOxlSqpY1358.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/p5UUihYgGg543.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/MY1L2yUeEV582.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/sZ2PLNWJoW1217.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/WSxPIFpAVt797.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/DEUgWvkg3b1166.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/ptu48z23eE47.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/64MdYIoNeR1394.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/qhPXaTNeaf407.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/FN57XV79aP1377.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/afJVPdbiqW358.html
http://ishigaki-senju.com/Templates/uLZ9OSUjsH56.html

« Hide Comments

Yeah, but it's news analysis. So, that makes it okay.

Uncultured red-state SUV Bushbot rube.

Ya think?!?

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

I just want to be one of your anonymous sources.

Not that anyone would know, but still...

Works for me. We could call you, "Shallow Thought".

I'm pretty sure you didn't mean that as a compliment...

« Hide Comments

You nailed it. More fuel
for the litegation fire.

« Hide Comments

*this article in the Banner is hardly a defense. However, we don't have Democrats up in arms trying to bring Rep. Sanders up on ethical charges to kick him out of Congress.

I agree with the article completely: it's really not right, even if not illegal or inethical, and so politicians should stop doing it. But Democrats should stop hounding DeLay about it, either.

« Hide Comments

*the article doesn't mention Rep. Sanders' affiliation in the first few paragraphs...but a quick Google search indicated he is an "independent", so that kinda makes some sense. Except that negative articles about Republicans always identify the politician as GOP as early and often as possible.

The difference is that the amount paid to Sander's relatives was appropriate to the work done: 15,000 a year for his daughter to work tirelessly on his campaign, and 30,000 for his wife's press services (that she normally charges more for, but gave her husband a discount).

DeLay was paying much more egregious amounts of money for much less transparent and questionable services.

As for why it matters? This is campaign money -- it's money raised from donors.

If I write a 100 dollar check to a campaign (Which is beyond my means as a starving college student, but take it as an example), I'd hope that out of gratitude for my support, and out of good ethical standards, I could feel confident that my 100 dollars wasn't just funneled towards paying for the candidate's daughter's new Mercedes.

That's why there is quite possibly (not for sure) an ethical issue in the DeLay case, but probably not in the Sander's case.

It's not that they were on the payroll, it's what they're supposedly getting paid for and how much.

And it's not a matter of the law, it's a matter of ethics. All sorts of unethical things are nonetheless legal, and it's fair game to criticize a public figure on those grounds.

Good points, but I have a few minor objections.

First, I'm not so sure Sanders got any more value for his money than DeLay did. "Consultation" by a spouse sounds cushy and unjustified if it isn't done by the best person on the market...and the nepotism of "hiring" a wife to do that seems suspect.

Second, these aren't public funds. It wasn't money from taxes, it was money from donations. Ethics? Last I saw, donations don't come with strings attached. It is money to help someone get elected, period. You can't complain if someone spends too much on air time as opposed to yard signs, or vice versa. Once that money is in his coffer, it's for whatever legal use his campaign deems necessary to get elected.

Far worse is when union dues go to sending union officials to bogus conferences and renting limousines and such. That happens all the time. Also far worse is when politicians use tax dollars for junkets that are more like vacations or political events...like President Clinton and his officials taking more trips and spending more time away from DC, with larger entourages, than any other President in recent history. Or using overnight stays in the White House to raise re-election funds.

I'm reserving final judgment for some sort of actual illegal or inethical charge to come out, but I haven't seen one yet. It seems like Democrats are just calling whatever DeLay does 'inethical' and hoping that with enough accusations, people might start believing baseless accusations are justified.

Politics of Personal Destruction, indeed.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

This is exactly why I laugh when I see certain blogs continue to pound the 'Impending Theocracy' theme.

« Hide Comments

*that appellation is seeming more appropriate all the time, since liberal judges in California have redefined the term "mainstream" to mean: in agreement with liberal lawmaker views but in opposition to what the majority of citizens want/think/believe.

If the memo is fake, why did so many Republicans use the same language?

"She's never had independent counsel and I think that if Ted Bundy, as a mass murderer gets lawyer and get access to court, Terri Schiavo as a disabled lady should get the same." - Gibbs, Schindler lawyers

"When it comes to federal legal protection, Terri Schiavo ranks below Ted Bundy, and when it comes to protection from suffering, she ranks below an unwanted pet." - Catholic Culture

"If we accord that right to someone like John Wayne Gacy or Ted Bundy, shouldn't we give at least equal protection to someone with a disability, charged with no crime, who is at risk of being starved and dehydrated to death?" - National Right To Life

"Like it or not, convicted murderers Ted Bundy and Danny Rolling received more due-process protections than Terri Schiavo, a person utterly innocent of any wrong-doing." - Ken Conner, former president of the Family Research Council

"He continues to promote the interests of Michael Schiavo by refusing Terri the right to independent counsel, a right which even serial killers like Ted Bundy received." - Bonnie Chernin Rogoff, GOPUSA.com

"If the proceedings that led up to the execution of serial-killer Ted Bundy had been handled in the same way, Bundy's conviction would have been overturned." - Florida State Sen. Daniel Webster

"If we accord that right to someone like John Wayne Gacy or Ted Bundy, shouldn't we give at least equal protection to someone with a disability, charged with no crime, who is at risk of being starved and dehydrated to death?" - conservativealerts.com

"This legislation ensures that individuals like Terri Schiavo are guaranteed the same legal protections as convicted murderers like Ted Bundy."- Traditional Values Coalition

“Martinez Aide Wrote Schiavo Memo�, Keith Epstein, Tampa Tribune, Apr 7, 2005

“A senior aide to freshman Florida Republican Sen. Mel Martinez has admitted to writing an unsigned incendiary memo listing the political advantages for Republicans of intervening in the Terri Schiavo case, Martinez said Wednesday night.
Martinez said he passed along the ``now-infamous memo'' to Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa…�

Seriously, no one is surprised by the callous manipulation of the truth or cold exploitation of human suffering for personal and political gain this incident displays. That's part of the republican credo. The surprising thing is that Martinez was caught. Of course he was all too ready to throw his aide under a bus to save himself. What a coward.

It has been amusing watching your contortions over Mel Martinez's "Memo-gate". With moves like I'd think it would be relatively easy for you to remove your head from your rectum. But a simple "Gee whiz! I guess I was wrong!" is beyond your powers.

Check your colon for polyps while you’re up there.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

We still have a small school nearby (well, it has like 100 students + faculty, total) where some kids take four-hooved transport to school. More and more, though, due to budget cuts the small rural schools are being closed. It's asd, but better than no education at all, I guess.

The dad in the article made a good point about how much safer it is to send her on the family mule than to walk. She's protected from everything from snakes to people with evil intentions.

« Hide Comments

MSM wasn't all over this for a very simple reason:
so many people have stopped looking for work that the "reported" unemployment rate doesn't mean much anymore. It's almost a joke for those who are aware of this fact.
Real unemployment is closer to 9%, with newly created jobs mostly low wage service sector.
Ain't Bushworld grand......

Do you have a clue how ridiculous you sound? Making stuff up doesn't constitute proof, nor does repeating DU talking points.

If you have a shred of proof of your assertions, provide a link.

If not, I'll have to ignore you.

« Hide Comments

OMG! I just realized we're all gonna die!!!!!

Everybody start chanting "Kyoto!! Kyoto!!" before the beetles eat all the trees!!!

Funny, this corresponding website: http://www.worldviewofglobalwarming.org

Has that now-notorious bad graph of global warming over time.

Have you seen the temperature graph after all possible normal variations have been factored out?
I've got a copy of it right here:

__________________________________________________

« Hide Comments

*No, he wasn't the QB for the Oakland Raiders. That was Rich Guckert Gannon.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

I can't believe they missed the opportunity to slip in a derogatory slam against SUVs, too; something like: "The Dollars specifically wanted seven children to justify their ownership and constant use of an SUV."

"The children were home-schooled, so their contact with the outside world was very limited."

Hardly a sweeping condemnation of homeschooling, although poorly phrased (put much better in the CNN article I link at the WWR). They should include it as an explanation as to how the abuse could be hidden from friends, teachers, etc.

Hey! No fair injecting common sense and reasonableness into my snarky over-reaction! [grin]

« Hide Comments

I find the entire discussion fascinating. Looks like he laid his case out well. I'm agnostic on this one but I have to say that nothing--absolutely nothing--would surprise me at this point.

Sheesh. That was pretty non-commital, wasn't it?

« Hide Comments

D'oh! ;)

<groooooan>

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

Alternate Title: The accuracy of this picture could not be fully verified. But since other people have photoshopped Dan Rather, bias against his journalistic integrity cannot be assumed....

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

You said it so well!!!!!! Condescension on stilts. (!)

I hope you don't watch CNN coverage of Africa or Asia too often, dude; you'll end up having a stroke before you hit 40. The BBC offers the most consistent stream of out-of-touch, elitist prigs who bash Americans for being out-of-touch elitist prigs, but CNN is way more accomplished (as it were) at ruthlessly goading ordinary people into fitting their preconceived triumphs-and-tragedies storyline.

« Hide Comments

I'd have to disagree. "Flood" has a number of meanings, not all having to do with water. I'd say that "flood the zone" derives from the second intransitive verb definition listed at dictionary.com (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=flood): To pour forth; overflow.

I suspect that this definition arose when someone was trying to describe some action that resembled a flood in terms of "covering" every part of an area.

Um, I don't want to sound to flippant or dismissive, but:
No. It's a sports term.
"Zone coverage" was developed in basketball and baseball as an easier way to cover receivers and shifty guards who could juke a defender out of his shoes. The defender covered his area, or zone. So offenses reacted by putting more guys in a zone than the person responsible for the zone could cover. So defenses would assign 1-2 extra guys to help out if their zone was empty. So offenses would put more guys in the zone than the defense could cover. If the defense put everyone in the zone, then it was too easy to break someone free on a 'back door' move.
The term for putting lots of guys in one zone is called "flooding the zone".
I thought that was common knowledge. But then, I'm a big-time football fan.

« Hide Comments

*news media, anchors, reporters, talking heads...the terminology is necessarily imprecise, but you know what I mean.

**I'm convinced that is the whole purpose for the existence of Jane's military information: to provide the British with plausible cover so they can lower classification or even declassify large chunks of information that is most useful when in the open.

***"We found this spoon, sir."

Can we get a news media that cares more about the good of the nation than its own agenda? Is that too much to ask?

I doubt it, at this point. Unless we get a complete turnover of people OR some other equally seismic event among journalists and those who train upcoming journalists, it's probably a lost cause. Eventually I'm hoping that journalism schools (and the national networks) will either wake up and see what's happening around them, or they'll become completely irrelevant. They're durn near close to that already.

Realize that we've got a whole group of people who have been brought up to trust themselves and serve themselves, since there is no higher purpose than that... in the 80s, Whitney Houston sang of The Greatest Love of All -- "Learning to love yourself... it is the greatest love of all." Look where that line of thinking got her. And it's infected a terrible lot of others as well.

There are a few of us out here who have emerged from that cocoon of selfishness and understood the bigger picture... I'm thinking that most blue-state journalists haven't.

We have good journalists who know they serve their readers, often by making knowledge accessible.

But there surely is a trend in journalism to serve one's own career.

I go to the Neiman Institute's conference on narrative journalism each year--about 1000 journalists, many of them quite good.

But each year I'm perplexed by the way some journalists turn simple moral situations into ethical conundrums too difficult for them to solve: If your source is dying for lack of simple commodities which you could provide, is it unethical to provide them?

« Hide Comments

At some point in time, "journalistic ethics" will take its rightful place among such oxymoronic giants as "jumbo shrimp" and "adult male."

« Hide Comments

I apologize for Charlie. He would have frozen to death if I had not given him my place in the warmup tent an Kunu Ri in 1950.
Freeze now, you Commie Bastard!

« Hide Comments

First: I saw the clip shown on The Lehrer Report. Isn't it a shame that we need to know such information before we can evaluate someone's comment. I believe that I saw and heard a Marine shoot (and presumably kill) a person in Falujah, Iraq, a combat zone. The person was prone and appeared to be dead. Some other person stated that the prone person was breathing. The same person or someone else said that he was pretending to be dead. The Marine then shot him and stated: "He's dead now." I presume that he was then dead, if not before. Did I hear the bravado in the Marine's voice? Yes.
I was surprised that the discussion on Lehrer that followed was about the death, that it included three people brought in especially to discuss the piece and that someone had apparently raised an issue about the clip.
Now I know what is up.
Many have wondered what will happen in the "next" war when GI's in the foxhole have cell phones. Well, now we know. WHATEVER happened here, did anyone think that such things don't happen in war? There are those who think that a Marine should die before violating the civil rights of anyone, much less kill them. Those who think that should be left to the mercies of a terrorist bent on torture. People who have had to face war will instinctively side with the Marine. There are too many dead Marines already who tried to be too careful with dead bodies or wounded terrorists faking death. I'll say it: I side with him even if he thought the wounded Iraqui probably wasn't dangerous. Probably isn't good enough. This is war. Did the dead man know he was in a war zone? Yes. Did he have an opportunity to get out? Yes.
End of story.

notherbob:"Did the dead man know he was in a war zone? Yes. Did he have an opportunity to get out? Yes."

did he have the opportunity to get out of the war zone that is his country? was he to immigrate to canada?

or do you mean did he have the opportunity to get out of Fallujah? If you followed the way the evacuation of Fallujah occured you would know the US forces refused exit of all men of his age and forced them back to the city the last few weeks.

There are plenty of military men (I am one) who don't fault the marine per se in this case but who see the Falujah siege as essentially an attrocity.

You toss the term "terrorist." we don't know any such thing, we don't know the man was even one of the legal combatants that comprise the bulk of the Iraqi isnurgency! Our position is there were 2,000 to 3,000 insurgents in Fallujah last month. We allowed the evacuation of everyone but "military age men" who were all turned back. Population is 300,000. 70% had fled in past three months. Pentagon estimates before the attack were that 1,500 to 2,000 insurgents remained. this would mean you have somewhere between 50,000 to 5,000 NON INSYRGENT military age men! in any most military age men left in Fallujah are not insurgents by our own reconing. These men may have been terrorists, may have been legal combatants, or may have had never been either as far as we know and may have fled the fighting to the mosque.

"People who have had to face war will instinctively side with the Marine"
We may "instinctively side with the Marine, but we do not all side with the idiots who thought to make Iraq a lesson in transformation.

If you lived in Iraq my friend and hated Saddam, there is a very good chance that at this point you would hate American troops and take up arms. At this point we have killed someone in almost every family.

Wes,
You assume an awful lot about the state of mind of the terrorist.

Yes, terrorist. Somewhere between 60% and 80% of the terrorists fighting us in Fallujah are from outside Iraq. Terrorists from all over the Middle East are coming to Iraq for the chance to kill Americans.

Most of the civilians had fled the city long before the operation started because the terrorists had made their lives miserable, imposing Taliban-like restrictions on people, terrorizing them, raping women, stealing, beating men if they shaved their beard.

You've heard the saying: lie down with dogs, get up with fleas. Or "Birds of a feather flock together." The Chinese have something similar: "You get black if you stay around ink all the time..."
This group of terrorists had been firing on US Marines. Weapons were around the room. This one was feigning being dead...to pick up a weapon after the Marines moved on to attack them from the rear? Maybe. Probably. They are investigating it, though.
Are any of the terrorists investigating the murder of Mrs Hassan, a British ex-patriot? Or the Polish women who was in Iraq to help people? Or Nick Berg? If they did investigate, would any of the terrorists be charged with a crime?

Take another look at the saying about lying down with dogs, then consider the inhumanity of those you are so vociferously defending. You need a flea collar.

No, my friend, it is YOU who toss the terms “atrocity� and “idiots�.
Your statement about someone in almost every family being killed is not true. I don’t believe we have killed someone in almost every family who has traditionally resided in Falujah, much less Iraq.
It is good that you are commenting outside the liberal cocoon and I, for one, welcome such comments. One hint: outside the cocoon, ridiculous claims that are not supported by facts will be challenged. This is especially true if they attack our (you don’t mind being included in “our�, do you?) government or its policies. Attack away, but please try to stick to the facts.
One more tip: Iraq is not Vietnam. Outside the cocoon, people do not relate the two so you must state your assumptions or your points will not be understood.
I would be pleased to gain more understanding of the point of view of those who think we are on the wrong track in Iraq. Even though it is in the past, I hope we did learn something from Vietnam.
I know all the bad guys who wanted to apparently escaped Falujah. I don't know about the practice regarding military age men you cite. Would you be insulted if I said I doubt that it's true? Sorry.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

Yeah, me too (My calculation tacks on Hawaii and New Jersey)

« Hide Comments

*and hispanics, according to other sources not covered in this post

**which doesn't seem likely because Bush is picking up percentages of populations, not just numbers.

***which is supported by logic, as well, since any campaign that has a significant movement like Kerry Haters for Kerry can't be drawing that much support from Republicans. I've gotta think that the Republicans For Kerry movement is actually Democrats claiming to be Republicans to try and sway voters...you know, like Michael Moore claiming to be an Independent, or Andrew Sullivan trying to insist he was undecided until just recently?

****But they also show the President's Approval Rating is above the supposedly crucial threshold at 52%.

I saw an interesting interview with Pat Caddell - the Dem Pollster Since the Beginning of Time (whose also pretty disgusted with his party) who has said that the "undecideds break against the incumbent" meme is a huge myth.

He hauled out some numbers that said that, with the exception of Jimmy Carter, undecideds broke for the incumbent on election day. The reason, as he gave it, was pretty common-sense. If you still can't make up your mind on the day of the election, you're much more likely to vote for the known quantities of the incumbent than you are to vote for a change.

I read the same info, and it seemed plausible to me, but none of the "experts" seem to accept it.

You know? I think this election may destroy most trends, expectations, theories, and practices. The old ways of doing things and the old assumptiosn are getting thrown out the window by the changes in society and information flow.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

My main purpose, in the post you are quoting, was to build up to the link to the news about the manufacturing index. I could have gone further about the Establishment survey. For one thing, it tends to count any new union jobs, meaning more union dues, meaning more campaign donations. It is more difficult to tax the self-employed, even if they make no effort to avoid or cheat. Note for example the IRS action against Indianapolis Baptist, which was shut down for the crime of being a collective of ministers who each took up their own collection and each paid all of the taxes due on that income (confirmed by audit) instead of being an Establishment which paid a salary minus withholding. Worst of all, people who do not depend on a big company for employment and security will be less inclined to depend on the government for their well-being.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

*Weeelllll, maybe PunKus....

I was going to start fisking at the letter-level, but it was taking too long.

And I have come up with yet ANOTHER new way to Fisk. To check it out, click on my link.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

*Don't be making the mistake of thinking he's just the Ecosystem guy. You'd be missing out on some good stuff.

HULK WANT TO BE MARINE! MARINES SMASH!...oops wrong blog *grin*. But wouldn't that drive our Islamist daffy to see the big green guy heading in their general direction?

« Hide Comments

Wow!

I applaud Zell for criticizing Matthews for
beating up on Michelle, but not because I think she's "Weak". Anyone can beat up on someone after they've sucker punched 'em in the kidneys. You're right, it wasn't because she was inferior to Matthews, it was because he dishonorably blindsided her.

Brain, she's a professional, and she should have been better prepared. Next time, she'll probably come out swinging.

It would be nice, if for all our talk about equal rights, we could actually treat women like equals. Malkin's no "little girl", and shouldn't be fawned over like a wounded bird. She's already bounced back, and she'll be better at this in future interviews. I have a feeling she probably wouldn't want people pitying her.

A professional what? She hasn't typically been the one to go onto hostile shows to discuss policy and such; rather, she has been a pundit within conservative, non-hostile circles.

Moreover, she was asked on the show to discuss her book, but Chris Matthews didn't even discuss it.

I don't really think it surprising she wasn't prepared.

Other than that, I agree with you. In fact, I more than agree with you, those were the exact points I was trying to make.

Oops! I thought it funny you called me "Brain" rather than "Nathan". I just realized (haven't checked my email for the correction I'm sure is there waiting for me) that you were responding to Brian, which makes the comment make more sense to me. I apologize...

Whoops, I met Brian. and I will just call you Nathan. ;)

I ALWAYS type out "brian" "brain". Guess I need to use the latter more. ;)

I apologize if I came across as "fawning over her like a wounded bird". And I in no way meant to offend your sensibilities by being such a chauvinist as to think it was dishonorable of Matthews to lure her on his show under another pretext, then blind side her with a different issue, and then shout over her when she tried to reason with him. For the record, I would have been equally offended had he done that to anyone, man OR woman. I applaud Miller for standing up for a bully, even if Miller's choice of descriptives of Michelle was more condescending than any of us would have made.

As for misspelling my name, you aren't the first, you won't be the last.

What kind of extreme right-wing neo-conservative blog is this?!! Michelle Malkin is a psychotic bitch who throws a temper tantrum because she goes on Hardball to plug her shitty racist book, and doesn't expect to have to answer any questions about anything.
It's amusing that people like Matthews and Bill Maher are accused of badgering guests simply because they choose to ask a follow-up question, yet none of you assholes ever hold your heroes, Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly, accountable when they bully people.
You are all a bunch of fascist dittoheads who will be very happy to play the victim when Kerry gets elected in November!

Four More Months, baby!!!

Thanks for providing an excellent example of Democrat/liberal insanity. It really helps demonstrate my point that the Left has lost all relevancy when people like you can do nothing more than spew inanities and hatred. If you ever calm down enough to accept reality, I'm willing to have an actual conversation....

I've been hoping for years that someone would take a 2 by 4 and bash Matthew's right across his big mouth. Michelle Malkin not prepared...that is unadulterated bullshit....Matthews started screaming and interrupting her with yes or no at least 20 times, trying to get her to answer yes to words he put in her mouth. Fuck Chris Matthews.

« Hide Comments

*I never liked 'occupation'. I know President Bush used it at least once, but we didn't occupy a nation being governed willingly, we freed a people from a tyrant. The tyrants supporters and allies are still resisting our attempt to guarantee that the people remain free. Not every citizen wants us there, but the local people with perspective on the situation recognize the necessity. Describing that as an 'occupation' is clumsy at best and reprehensibly manipulative at worst.

« Hide Comments

I remember when I was a kid, I used to wonder why all the fuss about politics. My folks were active in following the Kennedy campaign and took an active part in the Goldwater campaign, at the grass roots level, some 4 years later. Because of that I was exposed to it rather early, but it wasn't till high school, that it took on some significence.

Now, we face an evil abroad which if allowed to continue unchecked can and will threaten our western civilization as we have come to know it. And at home we face a far sinsiter threat. That of what is fast becoming two polar opposites in our choice for the leader of the free world.

Sometimes I wonder, if it would have been somewhat less stressful 50 years ago...when all we had to worry about was the "Commies" and "The Bomb" (and most times they were one and the same, fear wise).

But come November I shall vote as I have in the last eight elections....for the best man availible for the times and the job. In this case George Bush. And to hell with the NYT!

I just posted a question myself on my blog about all of this veteran crap. Do people actually care about this trivial junk compared to the real issues the U.S. faces?

Weeellllll, I do care, because I think this is establishing whether or not Kerry tells the truth. If he does not, how can we trust him on any of the real issues? But I'm tired of blogging about it.
In any case, I'm sure they'll discuss issues like Iraq, the War on Terror, the economy and such in the debates.

I'm with you on the truth factor. For me that has been established and it seems to be droning on. Perhaps it needs to continue for the rest on the masses to get it.

I agree that the issue -- why it "matters" -- is because it establishes that John Kerry lies, has lied, is continuing to do so, just to maintain his idea of self-history.

I think he's maintained a finely constructed self-portrait ("it's seared into [him]") about who he THINKS others will believe he is, and that's why it's threatening to such an extent to the Left and to Kerry and now even Edwards (who "defends" Kerry's "military record of service" although Edwards was no where even remotely near Kerry's military service when it took place)...because, it calls into question the fact that some people in the country are ready and willing to follow Mr. Make Believe into oblivion.

The Demos are literally grabbing at straws this evening with anyone and everyone possible as to blame, demands, accusations, about this issue. Everything EXCEPT proving Kerry right, or, providing any iron-clad proof that what the Swiftees have to say is not true.

Instead, they and apologists continue to blame Bush and "call on Bush to renounce the ads (by the Swiftvets)" and the like. Nothing about Kerry's lies, meanwhile, not a peep...

Yes. And so while I'm personally a little bit tired of it all because I've been convinced of his essential dishonesty and lack of integrity for some time, I don't mind the situation being flogged and blogged for a while yet, for one important: the Democrats and the press are willing to overlook significant integrity and honesty problems of Kerry as long as they can get W out of the White House. Every person who sees the blatant bias in the news and the lack of concern about honesty by the Dems is another person who won't trust those institutions very much in the future.
This isn't just about defeating Kerry anymore, for me (because I think that will happen, easily). It's about Democrats who deliberately conceal their agenda so they can get elected, and the mainstream news media who make it easy for them to do so. I want both institution to collapse. I want an America that demands a reasonable level of honesty from its politicians.

Nathan, you make good points. For more on the, "anybody but Bush," zealots, I invite everyone to visit TownHall.com: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/douggiles/dg20040821.shtml

Does anyone dispute that Kerry served a stint in Vietnam? I don't think so. What we seem to have is some veterans who have a deep personal hatred of Kerry for his activities after his service. Apparently none of his critics were actually there when Kerry supposedly took fire. Read William Rood's account of the February 28 incident - he was there.

It is interesting to me that so much is being made of this Vietnam incident. It happened 35 years ago! It would seem to me that where both men would take us in the next four years should be more important.

Kerry "lied" about wounds he recieved and Bush "lied" about WMDs in Iraq. Call it a wash and move on, fer crying out loud...

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

This late August poll may be of some help. It was taken after both conventions I believe.. Republicans had theirs first.Shows Gore taking the lead. I'll need to do a bit more googling to see just how big his lead got, but at this point it was just a point.. After being down double digits the month or so before.

However these polls suggest that Bush enjoyed a decent lead in late October..

Back then, polls were swinging wildly all over the place in stark contrast to this year's polls. that could change though, closer we get, but i doubt it.

arvin

a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/07/27/cnn.poll/">This CNN poll taken just before the GOP convention shows Bush with a pretty comfortable lead..

Personally I felt the convention in 2000 was a bit too stiff, lifeless. Bush wasn't the speaker he is today (though that aint sayin a whole lot). I thought the convention hurt us frankly.

This year we have got to up the 'hipness' quotient, and show just how big our tent really has become.. I think we will..

arv

sorry I butchered the html on that one.. still learning..

a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/07/27/cnn.poll/">here's tha poll

The "media" doesn't want to be proven wrong. So, they write that foolish and implausible line, "the election is Kerry's to lose."

I complained to ABC's POLITICAL UNIT for use of that line and more in their column from last week, in which they also made ridiculously false statements and points that the average person would ASSUME to be "true" (it's ABC's POLITICAL UNIT, ABC News, for Heaven's sake, it's "reliable" most readers assume)...in column style that was and remains somewhat indistinguishable from reading WONKETTE'S coverage of "Six Feet Under."

It's this sort of vampish, gossipy, insulting abuse of journalism that is making it nearly impossible to distinguish "media" from "Live Journal."

With the amount of money that has been and is being "donated" to many media outlets, not to mention stocks owned and by whom, by that handful of Democrat funders -- Heinz-Kerry, Soros, Bill Gates and others -- we no longer have a "free press" in the U.S. but some network of chatty Public Relations bobble heads filling up newssites, making numerous and misleading categorizations about what public opinion IS.

And Democrats have the nerve to ridicule "drug companies" as they like to call them, and "insurance companies" for being pro-GOP, while there is hardly any media remaining that isn't some version of a kitchen mimeograph machine by wealthy Democrats.

I personally get most of my info from Rasmussen and Gallup, and indeed to me it looks as if the election is Kerry's to lose. HOWEVER, that does not mean he'll win, but rather, his/his campaign's own actions (or inaction) will be the factor that sinks him should he lose.

I was stunned by the turnout at the last Kerry rally of the road tour. Like nothing I have ever seen. He's got a lot of support; it's a matter of him keeping it.

Thanks for the information, Arvin, I guess I remembered it incorrectly.

Ummm, Jo, that was in Oregon, right? ...your state is not exactly known as a bastion of moderate thought...

This was by far the largest crowd any candidate has ever had here. And we're considered a "battleground state", or so I have been told.

There's plenty of moderate thought, and cool enough heads that no one said anything negative to the Bush-supporting protesters or the weirdo with the anti-zionist pro-Nader bizarre collage sign.

Moment of the day...

"Would you sign this petition to get Nader on the ballot?"

"No, thank you."

"It's just to get him on the ballot, it's not saying you'll vote for him."

"No. I don't particularly like him and wouldn't want to support him in any way."

"Please?"

"I'm sorry, no."

"Seriously, I'm just doing this to get paid, will you please sign?"

"NO!"

You want a decent rundown of similarities between '00 and '04, polls and timelines?

Washington post magazine, early august/late july.

enjoy.

Ben,
Got a link to go with that...?

Apparently, the preposterous non-speak of the "it's Kerry's (election) to lose" is lost on some who comment here (but not on me).

So, alright, byebyeKerry, byebyethen, byebye, Kerry, byebye...

The statement is one that's intended to prevent anyone using it from actually saying anything while suggesting everything. As in, redundant and self evident; as in, such a generality as to be impossible to either prove or disprove. As in, Kerry will lose and they won't have to be among those who can be later accused of calling it wrong. Or right. Or, having an opinion. Or, not having an opinion. As in, "it's Kerry's to lose," as in, of course it is. But it only means nothing. Not that the ELECTION BELONGS TO KERRY, as the statement suggests by ommission, just that he's running, it's an election he's running in, he can lose, he probably won't win...

Suzy,
Careful, please. There is no reason to make pointed comments directed at specific individuals, veiled or not.

Washington Post Magazine link.

A pretty good read...

« Hide Comments

*The internet and particularly blogging allows large groups of influential people to share information without the mainstream news media Stamp of Approval, which is why we can actually have an inter-regional discussion of the issue of the news media's non-coverage of news items.

The editors who decide which pieces to run see no bias in their decisions. They feel as though anyone who is citicizing John Kerry's war record is some kind of "right wing nut", which you and I both know is an archtypal evil character who deserves no audience in the minds of liberals.

« Hide Comments

So true, the economy and…and…and…

Feed ‘em what they want to hear with the charisma of Ronald Regan but don’t do anything. Talk feel-good crap, yeah, make me feel warm and fuzzy, mmmm.

No thanks, I’ll take someone who says what they are going to do and then does it.

Me, too.

It was said Friday "Nothing is more pessimistic than saying America can't do better."

This post just triggered that recent memory.

I can think of one thing more pessimistic than that:
Saying "Nothing is ever good enough if a Republican does it." That's essentially what Kerry is saying, isn't it?

I think that's a rather hypersensitive reaction, personally. And I think we'd be doing better had McCain been the Repub candidate, too.

Then why won't Kerry explain exactly how he would have done it better? Why don't Democrats admit that every major indicator is better than under Clinton's best years? Said track record is what they point to as "proving" Democrats can handle the economy better, and in retrospect was clearly nothing more than a bubble built on speculation regarding e-business... Why don't Democrats admit that the economy is doing well even despite the huge negative impact of September 11th? Nope, all we hear about is that Bush is responsible for lost jobs (a questionable proposition at best), and Kerry will make the economy better, I guess through raising taxes and increasing govt spending, which is all but proven to be the worst thing for an economy. But somehow that would be "better". Better for Democrat politicians, I guess, but not for the people.

6036 jobs online part time jobs work online work online from home work at home work from home online jobs work at home jobs work at home business jobs
Full time jobs dental plan dental
insurance
dental insurance
plan
discount dental
plans
cheap dental
plans
individual dental
plans

« Hide Comments

Sometimes Ann can go a bit overboard on being vindictive, but most of the time she always leaves a trail of dead liberals formed in the shape of an arrow that points at the problem.

(Hey, that sounds metephorical....maybe I should update my post about this....)

No worries Nathan!!

« Hide Comments

My wife noticed that when she first saw the news about McGreedy. If there's no media bias, why are scandals about Democrats never accompanied by their partisan affiliation, while scandals about Republicans sound like the entire Republican Party must be involved?

« Hide Comments

What???? Gaia Blasphemy!!! Tofu powered vehicles will get 10,000 miles to the tablespoon! You can power a VW with love! ABUGHARIB!!!! /LLL

Actually, hydrogen is a good idea because you get more hydrogen generated electricity per gallon of oil than you can get mechanical power from the same amount of oil turned gasoline. However, most people just don't realize that hydrocarbons are the best source of H and assume that we'll just pull it out of some magical hydrogen well or even funnier, water! The amount of fuel you have to burn to get the electricity to separate the H is immense.

the United States has already built a car that gets near 50 MPG, it was phased out when sales slumped. It was unattractive car, perhaps that's why it was dropped. It was able to seat up to 4 people, albeit uncomfortably for the two in the back.

Biodiesel isn't an idea cooked up by bored hippies...there are several places in the US you can have your auto converted to Biodiesel, and even I have been surprised in its effectiveness. I would encourage people to look into Biodiesel, especially those who drive trucks.

Much like you, Nathan, we keep two cars, but for the most part one just sits. The one that doesn't sit is equipped with a 2.2 litre Ecotec engine (GM) and we couldn't possibly be more pleased with the combination of "zippiness" and MPG. Interestingly, the one that just sits is a teeny tiny hatchback that actually gets worse MPG.

On the matter of SUVs: My parents have one extended cab truck, one crew cab 4X4, and they are an absolute necessity when it comes to keeping the farm running. But when it comes to running errands, driving long distances, etc. they use a compact car, and don't understand why there's people in boat-sized Excursions and Suburbans picking up soda and a loaf of bread at Safeway. Frankly, other than for the "look at me" factor, I don't either.

Oh, yeah, there have been a host of cars getting 50 mpg. A VW Rabbit once got 60mpg on the highway, I think, using diesel. Many cars of all makes have gotten in the 40s, as well, but had one thing in common: woefully underpowered. You took your life in your own hands in any on-ramp. 0-60 was measured with a sundial.

Biodiesel isn't really widespread enough yet to be useful outside of large population centers. And if everyone depended on it, laws of supply and demand would make it far more expensive than fossil fuels. It's not a long-term, large-scale answer, but it is an alternative worth looking at for some people.

We've found that while we do need an actual truck a few times a year, it is far more economical to rent it from Lowe's for 2 hours 3 times a year than to own anything larger than our sport-cute Honda CRV.

I had a Metro, thought it was faaaantastic, until I had to merge onto I-5. ;) Then, panic set in.

Biodiesel is going to become as convenient as standard diesel in the next five years, is my prediction. I think we'll be surprised how useful it becomes. Especially for those who are environmentally conscious but absolutely must have a truck.

As to the matter of the "family" Suburban. There's no need for it. I am glad it's not a "daily driver" for Senator Kerry, but that doesn't mean it should be kept. I hope by now it has gone down the road.

« Hide Comments

More fuel for the fire:
I'm sick and tired of hearing about these "net jobs lost", when the number itself is an illusion.
This number does not take into account new Job-Creation, through new start-up companies.
I'm so disappointed that the media is still pushing this statistic around.

My former-roommate also discusses the Job-Myth on his site.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

but it's one of the funnier ones after the born loser and frank and ernest and zits and luanne, even when it took on the Clinton White House, etc., back in the 90s. Now the one that deserves to be trashed is that little Mallard Fillmore, which not only takes in vain the name of one of our little known presidents, but is mean spirited to boot. At least Doonesbury is mostly funny. More so than many of the regulars on the comic page. C'mon, get a life.

Wow. There *is* one person left in America who thinks Doonesbury is funny. :)

Sorry, Chuck, I couldn't resist.

It's okay, Deb, sometimes I have a weird sense of humor. Like whenever it's a politician that's the target.

I think they should keep Doonsbury AND run Chris Muir's Day by Day along side it...watch the numbers and at the end of 3 months, keep the one with the better numbers... bet Chris will still be standing.

...impossible to tell in a print newspaper. Online, tho, by clicking? Doonesbury has the edge just by name recognition, but Day by Day is far funnier.

We run Mallard Fillmore, Doonesbury, and the Boondocks in a section unrelated to the comics page. Works well.

Frankly, I wish him success, but I don't want Day by Day in my paper, and I'd just as soon get rid of the three I mentioned above. I remember when the comics page was full of lighthearted, apolitical humor, and a six year old could read them at the breakfast table and parents wouldn't have to worry. Our local paper has been judicious and kept it wholesome and lighthearted by relegating controversial, politically motivated cartoons to another area. I am constantly shocked, however, when traveling and noting that no other paper does.

I agree, Jo. If a cartoon is mainly political, it should be on the Op/Ed page with the political cartoons.
Berke Breathed sometimes crosses the line into the political, but I have less problem with him because it's not the norm, and he's usually funny. And maybe also because when he does it, he's less about advocating one side and more about skewering puffed up politicos of both sides.

Another one I have big problems with, at least recently, is Non Sequitor. That one is also going way over the line into political advocacy.

Allowing your personal views to color your comic strip's content is one thing; using your soapbox which is supposed to be for entertainment as a pulpit from which to hammer home a political point using 3-4 frames of minimal dialogue that allow no room to treat any topic in depth...well, it's Politics By Bumper Sticker in another form. Useless, and worse than useless, at least for entertainment.

You know, I think this is just one more example of an area that used to be for kids being hijacked by adults for adult purposes. It may be the self-centeredness of the Baby Boomers, it may be people trying to erode standards to an "Anything Goes" standard, or it may just be an unavoidable decline of a wealthy society. But the trend is rampant and in nearly everything these days. We don't let kids be kids anymore.

Wow. Republicans really are closed minded. After reading many of these articles and postings, I can see why people joke: There is no such thing as a young republican. Being so conservative really sucks the life out of you. I can see that in your hollow, empty attempts at being smart.

Why, that's sweet, Luccas. Thank you!

Simply put, a comic strip (political or otherwise) should to be funny. It has to at least try to evoke a laugh. The vast majority of Tinsley’s work is a purely political statement without even an attempt at humor. There is a conservative strip I like, Scott Stantis' “Prickly City�. While I rarely agree with the writer’s political views, I often laugh at the strip’s humor and appreciate the interesting artwork. “Mallard Fillmore� is bombastic, single minded, riddled with straw man arguments and just plain un-funny.

I had not seen Chris Muir’s "Day By Day" before. It seems funny enough and thoughtful. One thing I have to wonder about, Both Muir and Stantis are white. Both write strips with a black a "Republican" main character who is surrounded by white "Democrats". Is this tokenism or just wish fulfillment on their parts?

Probably both and neither at the same time.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

Yeah, right. What Democracy?

That's true. I forgot that Democracy was suspended by Katherine Harris in 2000 to select Bush as the (p)Resident.
I guess I forgot that since any possible dissent has been totally and absolutely crushed by John AshKKKroft.
[grin]

If anything, Fox News emplafies democracy and promotes it in everyway.

Are we forgetting about our freedom of speech and the press?

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

I suppose you are referring to matters such as:
under which administration did Enron start playing fast and furious with their books ?
under which administration did WorldCom start cooking the books ?

Yes, and many other things, as well...

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

On the site you linked, there is a link for cartoons which features 5 cartoonists. Without peeking, how many of those 5 cartoonists do you suppose have anti-Bush cartoons for this week?

I did peek, but only at the names. Toles is a Rall wannabe, and two others I think are knee-jerk lefties as well.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

Much of this post is in response to Ilyaka...I suspect that she was merely reacting to a misunderstanding of what her opponents were advocating. However, I feel must respond to what she actually said, including giving my reaction to logical implications. I'm willing to retract any of my assertions if her implications were unintentional.

Ilyaka kicks things off with this quote:

According to estimates from the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), there were 691,710 nonfatal violent victimizations committed by current or former spouses, boyfriends, or girlfriends of the victims during 2001 (table 1). Such crimes — intimate partner violence — primarily involve female victims. About 588,490, or 85% of victimizations by intimate partners in 2001 were against women. Intimate partner violence made up 20% of violent crime against women in 2001. By contrast, during the year intimate partners committed 3% of all nonfatal violence against men. (See Criminal Victimization 2001, Changes 2000-01, with Trends 1993-2001, NCJ 194610, for more information on victim/offender relationship.)

...then tries to pre-emptively dismiss any counterclaims by dismissing anything else as "conspiracy theories". This shows her unwillingness to actually face anything that might contradict her world view, as evidenced by the fact that she can base her entire argument on one stat by one organization. Sure, I'm sure she could find others, but to maintain her view she must ignore a whole host of information too voluminous to be mere conspiracy.

And here's the search string from which I found all those links in the first two pages. There's at least 22 pages (I didn't bother to click further), not all of which is applicable, of course.

But Ilyaka could have still been slightly more aware of both her source and the context of her data. The source is the US government, which assumes that violence is mostly men against women and the context goes right in line with this: since the law is written to arrest and prosecute men if any violence occurs, regardless of by whom and on whom, then naturally more men will be arrested and prosecuted. Since the legal system assumes that men are more violent, then naturally more men will be convicted, which is then used to justify laws that require men to be arrested and prosecuted even if they were a victim of violence. It's a vicious cycle.

The context of the web debate is that Cathy Young points out that the current laws in many locations are to automatically arrest and prosecute men if the police are called in a domestic violence dispute. If the violence is perpetrated on women 85% of the time as Ilyaka asserts, that would still not justify automatically arresting the man, because even by her own citing, in 15% of the cases the wrong person would be arrested. The people she was debating/disagreeing with (including Cathy Young's report, and Jeff Goldstein and Dean Esmay who were agreeing with Ms. Young) were not advocating men not bein arrested, they were just saying asserting that there are enough indications that women are violent against men to justify eliminating automatically arresting the man. If for no other reason, because even a false arrest can be used by women to prevent the man from getting custody.

Whether or not she intended to, Ilyaka is thus advocating that because of past conviction rates (not actual violence statistics, but only those that are reported, acted on by the police, brought to trial, and then convicted), men should, in fact, always be arrested in any domestic violence incident, regardless of that actual facts.

Someone gave the example of an argument in which he threw a dish into the corner. Ilyaka, perhaps unintentionally, insists he be arrested. Once, my ex-wife charged me and bit my arm (leaving teeth marks), ripped my shirt, pinched and twisted my skin hard enough to leave bruises, slapped me, choked me while saying "I'll kill you, I'll kill you!", and hit me hard enough to break my glasses. Since "guys aren't supposed to hit girls", I left the room and punched the wall in frustration, leaving a small hole. When my ex-wife saw this, she began wailing about my violent nature and was inconsolable for an hour. Had she called the police, Ilyaka would not have been satisfied unless I had been arrested for that, since 85% of convictions for violence are given to men. Thanks, Ilyaka, it's nice to know you are so charitable toward me.

The whole post is because I'm a little sick of the Deification (canonization?) of women in our society. I've already ranted (as have others) about how men are treated in something as ubiquitous as TV commercials and Sitcoms. The point of the post (and the other Mother's Day post), is to assert that women are no better (but also no worse), than men.

Women are merely the other side of the coin; generally, where men have a weakness, women have an opposite but equal weakness. If men obsess too much about sex, and use women to satisfy that craving, women obsess too much about money/security and use men to satisfy that craving. If men will dump women for someone younger/prettier/thinner, women will dump men for someone richer/more successful. If men have an urge to have sex with different women, women have an urge to control every aspect of their man's life and activities.

Women usually want to change the man they're with. Women nag. Women often judge/reject their partner's friends, yet hold their own as sacrosanct.

Women are petty, and will hate another woman for nothing more than having naturally clear skin, or garnering more attention from males. Beautiful women usually have few female friends...

Women are extremely capable of justifying their own actions (to themselves, at least), and thus a fight between women is usually extremely vicious with little sense of proportion. When men fight, it goes until someone says "uncle" and then it's done, sometimes resulting in new-found respect or friendship. When women fight, they are out to destroy, maim, or kill, and they will be enemies for life.

This is not to say that women are any worse. All the above aspersions are merely from looking at it from a male perspective. Men are just as bad from a female perspective. However, I wish to reiterate that I am extremely tired of our society, as well as specific members of our society, attempting to put women on a higher plane. Thus you get comments like Jo's:

...something in the neighborhood of 80% of those are considered "medical neglect". Considering the high rate of single moms and even married mothers being considered the primary "caregiver", this is something that should be taken into consideration when looking at these kinds of stats.

Perhaps I misunderstood what Jo meant by posting that...but let's turn it around:

...something in the neighborhood of 80% of men's abuse of children is "unintentional beatings", borne of frustration from women nagging and nitpicking. When men do kill, at least it's quick and relatively painless with a gunshot instead of slow and agonizing like "medical neglect", poisoning, or drowning the kid, which women usually do, and that should be taken into consideration when looking at these kinds of stats."

See how ridiculous that sounds? There is no rational way to try mitigate or minimize the fact of abuse, or trying to turn it around for it to "really be men's fault, actually". If you want to try to mitigate women's culpability by the reality of single-motherhood, you might want to go right back to the initial debate which is that the current policy of "automatically" arresting and prosecuting the man in complete disregard to actual facts of the case results in more men being forced out of the home, away from their kids. That's what Ms Young was asserting from the beginning, and what Jeff G. and Dean E. were supporting with non-"conspiracy theory" facts: that the current system does not help women or children, and should be reconsidered.

I'll restate it, more simply:
1) Domestic violence is a complex issue, and cannot simply be characterized as "Man on Woman".
2) As such, our current legal system that assumes that circumstance should be overhauled to reflect the true situation.
3) When a man has beaten a woman, he should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
4) However, when a woman assaults/commits battery on a man, it should also be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and currently is not.
5) When the violence is mutual, which is in approximately half of all domestic violence incidents, automatically arresting and prosecuting the man will not solve anything, and new solutions are required.

But there are people who are committed to making sure that no one even investigates the possibility. I sincerely hope Ilyaka isn't one of those.

Because here's some stats that are not mere conspiracy theory:

Violence against children by women is another issue where the public attitude is very different than the facts revealed by formal studies. The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-3) from the US Department of Health and Human Services (call 1-800-FYI-3366 for a copy) reveals data about child abuse by mothers:

Women commit most child abuse in intact biological families. When the man is removed from the family the children are at greater risk. Mother-only households are more dangerous to children than father-only households.

Children are 3 times more likely to be fatally abused in Mother-only Households than in Father-only Households, and many times more likely in households where the mother cohabits with a man other than the biological father.

Children raised in Single-mother Households are 8 times more likely to become killers than children raised with their biological father.

Other studies reveal more about female violence against children:

Women hit their male children more frequently and more severely than they hit their female children.

Women commit 55% of child murders and 64% of their victims are male children.

Eighty two percent of the general population had their first experience of violence at the hands of women, usually their mother.

Our culture learns to be violent from our mothers, not our fathers.

Yet, 3.1 million reports of child abuse are filed against men each year, most of which are false accusations used as leverage in a divorce or custody case.

And some more:

Minor Assaults: 

 Year                        1975  1985  1992


 Assault by husband      98     82      92


 Assault by wife            98     75      94


 

Severe Assaults: 

 Year                        1975  1985  1992


 Assault by husband      38     30      19


 Assault by wife            47     43      44

Wives report they have been severely assaulted by husband
22 per 1000

Wives report they have severely assaulted husband
59 per 1000

Husbands report they have been severely assaulted by wives
32 per 1000

Husbands report they have severely assaulted wives
18 per 1000

Husbands & wives both report wife has been assaulted
20 per 1000

Husbands & wives both report husband has been assaulted
44 per 1000

(Tables prepared using data from "Change In Spouse Assault Rates From 1975 to 1992: A Comparison of Three National Surveys In The United States", by Murray A. Straus and Glenda Kaufman Kantor)

Hmmm...I am still stewing on it, but over all some very thought provoking things here and I agree with much of it...but still need to allow it to sink in and re-read...

You know that I support this, really, but I think that it what I am examining is my reaction to a man saying it...interesting

Very interesting. Some of my visitors on buy mans leather wallet may like it so putting a leather-link up.

That's really interesting. My readers will like this, buy fine womens wallets. I'll send a link.

ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÏÑÏÔÉ
ÔÇÊ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÝáÓØíä
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÝáÓØíäíå
ÔÇÊ ÝáÓØíäí -
ÚÑÇÞ
ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ãÑßÒ ÑÝÚ
ÝÏíæ
ÇÝáÇã
ÓßÓ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ßæíÊíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇÑÏäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÇÑÏä
ÔÇÊ ÇáÇÑÏä
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÌÇÊ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓÚæÏíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÓÚæÏíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÓÚæÏí
ÔÇÊ ßÊÇÈí
ãÞÇáÇÊ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓÚæÏíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ãÕÑíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÈÍÑíäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ßæíÊíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ áíÈíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇÑÏäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ áÈäÇäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÞØÑíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚãÇäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇãÇÑÇÊíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÝáÓØíäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÊæäÓíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓæÑíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÇÊ ãÛÑÈíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓæÏÇäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ íãäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÌÒÇÆÑíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ ÕæÊíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÎáíÌíÉ ÕæÊíÉ
ãäÊÏì
ãÑßÒ ÑÝÚ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ßæíÊíÉ
ÔÇÊ ßæíÊí
ÔÇÊ ÇáßæíÊ
ÏÑÏÔÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÌÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÇáÚÇÈ
ÇáÚÇÈ ÝáÇÔ |
ÇÛÇäí |
ãæÞÚ ÇÛÇäí |
ÇÛÇäí ÚÑÇÞíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ãÕÑíå |
ÇÛÇäí ÇÑÏäíå |
ÇÛÇäí ÇÌäÈíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÓÚæÏíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÝáÓØíäíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÇãÇÑÇÊíå |
ÇÛÇäí ÓæÏÇäíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÞØÑíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ãÛÑÈíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÈÍÑíäíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÓæÑíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí áÈäÇäíå |
ÇÛÇäí íãäíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÌÒÇÆÑíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí ÚãÇäíÉ |
ÇÛÇäí áíÈíå |
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓæÑíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÑæÓíÇ
ÔÇÊ ÓæÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ãÕÑíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ãÕÑ
ÔÇÊ ãÕÑí
ÞÓã ÇáÇÓáÇãí
Çíãæ
ÕæÑ Çíãæ
ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ Çíãæ
ÕæÑ ßæËß
ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ßæËß
æÓÇÆØ
ÕæÑ ÑãÒíÉ
æÓÇÆØ 2011
ÕæÑ ááãÓä
ÕæÑ ááãÓä 2011
ÈÑÇãÌ ÌæÇá
ÏÑæÓ ÊÕãíã
ÏÑæÓ ÝæÊæÔæÈ
ÕæÑ ÊÕãíã
ÕæÑ ÊÕÇãíã
ÕæÑ ÈäÇÊ ááÊÕãíã
ÕæÑ ÔÈÇÈ ááÊÕãíã
ÇßÔä
ÓßÑÇÈÒ
ÎØæØ
ÝÑÔ
ÎÇãÇÊ
ãáÝÇÊ ÓæÊÔ ãÝÊæÍÉ
ÓæÊÔ ãÇßÓ
ÏÑæÓ ÓæÊÔ ãÇßÓ
ÇÛÇäí ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÇÛÇäí ÚÑÇÞíÉ 2011
ÇÛÇäí ÚÑÈíÉ
ÇÛÇäí ÚÑÈíÉ 2011
ÇÛÇäí ÇÌäÈíÉ
ÇÛÇäí ÇÌÈíäÉ 2011
ßáíÈÇÊ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ßáíÈÇÊ
ÈÑÇãÌ
ÇÈÑÇÌ
ÇÈÑÇÌ Çáíæã
ÍÙß Çáíæã
ãÓÇÈÞÇÊ
ÇÓÆáÉ æÇÌæÈÉ
ÇáÛÇÒ
ÇÝáÇã ÇÌäÈíÉ
ÊÍãíá ÇÝáÇã ÇÌäÈíÉ
ÇÝáÇã ÇÌäÈíÉ 2011
ÇÝáÇã ÚÑÈíå
ÊÍãíá ÇÝáÇã ÚÑÈíå
ÊÍãíá ÇÝáÇã ÚÑÈíå 2011
ÇÝáÇã ßÇÑÊæä
ãÓáÓáíÇÊ
ÓÊÇÑ ÇßÇÏãí
ãÓáÓáÇÊ ÊÑßíÉ
ÇÎÈÇÑ ÝäíÉ
ÇÎÈÇÑ ÝäÇíä
ÇÎÑ ÇÎÈÇÑ ÝäÇíä
ÊÍÔíÔ
äßÊ
äßÊ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
äßÊ ÚÑÇÞíÉ ÌÏíÏÉ
ÕæÑ ÊÍÔíÔ
ßÑÉ ÞÏã ÇáÚÇáãíÉ
ÑíÇÖÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÇÎÈÇÑ ÑíÇÖÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ãÞÇØÚ ÕæÑ áÇÚÈíä
ÕæÑ áÇÚÈíä
ÕæÑ ßÑÉ ÞÏã
ÕæÑ
ÕæÑ ÚÇãÉ
ÕæÑ ÛÑíÈÉ
ãÚÇáã ÕæÑ
ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ÚÑÈ
ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ÇÌÇäÈ
ÕæÑ ãØÑÈÇÊ ÚÑÈíÇÊ
ÕæÑ ãÔÇåíÑ ÚÑÈ
ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä 2011
ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ÇÌÇäÈ
ÕæÑ ãØÑÈÇÊ ÇÌäÈíÇÊ
ÕæÑ ÝäÇäíä ÇÌÇäÈ 2011
ÕæÑ ÓíÇÑÇÊ
ÕæÑ ÓíÇÑÇÊ 2011
ÕæÑ ÏÑÇÌÇÊ
ÕæÑ Çäãí
ÕæÑ Çäãí 2011
ÎæÇØÑ
ÚÐÈ ßáÇã
ÎæÇØÑ 2011
ÞÕÕ
ÞÕÕ ÌÏíÏÉ
ÞÕÕ ÞÕíÑå
ÔÚÑ ÔÚÈí
ÔÚÑ ÔÚÈí ÚÑÇÞí
ÇÈæ ÐíÇÊ
ÏÇÑãíÇÊ
ÔÚÑ ÔÚÈí 2011
ÔÚÑ ÔÚÈí ÍÒíä
ÏíßæÑ
ÇËÇË

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

But then I realized that no one watches CNBC.

Well, it's on that other Kevin's blog but the post was by Paul.

Oops. Heheh, yeah, you make that clear...it's just that Wizbang=Kevin in my mind, still.

I don't have anything worthwhile to say.

Yeah, i'm sure that there's plenty of evidence, but MoveOn, George Soros, etc just like looking like idiots for ignoring clear of 'evidence', since the traitorous press that sides with terrorists won't show the truth.

Maybe liberal idiots will grow a brain someday...but I doubt it.

Anyone who doesn't recognize that there is a clear connection between Saddam Hussein and terror is a complete idiot and a total oxygen thief.

also... "whackly" is not a word

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

I gotta tell ya, while he may be willing to go more to the extreme reaches of un-PC speech for the sake of humor, I find myself in agreement with his final conclusions about 99% of the time. Laugh if you enjoy his stuff, ignore the anti-PC humor if you don't, but read and heed his observations on human nature and events. He's usually dead-on.

« Hide Comments

Well, up until recently, I've been forced to engage in "defensive reading" of CNN and BBC, in which I throw out anything that isn't actually a fact and try to remain hypersensitized to editorializing juxtapositions.

But Matt Drudge's website (no link, you can find it yourself) has recently been linking articles from apnews.myway.com
I didn't really like AP much before, but they have improved quite a bit. I've really been impressed by the way they merely report the news without trying to score points for liberals. Well, they've recently demonstrated to me that they also are capable of taking the next step and providing unbiased context on contentious issues. Check out this excerpt:

Democrats call Bush's job creation record the worst of any president since the Great Depression. Since Bush took office, 1.84 million jobs have been lost, but after months of dismal job growth, the nation's employers in March added workers at the quickest pace in four years, swelling payrolls by 308,000.

Even so, the unemployment rate inched up a tenth of a point to 5.7 percent as more people were encouraged to start looking for work again but failed to find jobs.

To me, that aptly and fairly sums up both sides views, gives you the actual facts relatively bare of editorializing (although the "dismal" job growth comes close to ruining it...but it's still far better than CNN or the New York Times, overall), letting you make your own decision which aspect is the most important.

That's where I go for news, now.

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

Simply put, women prefer flexibility and satisfaction over higher pay.

If you take the time to factor in all the aspects, women make 98-99% of what men make when doing the same job at the same point in the career with the same home situation.

The MSNBC article almost glimpses the truth in the end, but chooses to make it into a joke:

Pay Vs. Satisfaction Despite the pay gap, according to several studies, women are actually more satisfied at work!

CareerBuilder.com's recent "Pulse of the Worker" survey found that despite receiving lower raises, fewer bonuses, and having lower expectations for being promoted, women were more likely than men to report that, overall, they are happy with their jobs.

Who said a woman is never satisfied?

See, the first and main factor in the "pay disparity" is children. When you drop out of the workforce for a few years to have children, your pay will suffer. You will be behind. You will have lost seniority, and be behind the "state of the art" in your field. Even if you only take off a few months, just having kids changes priorities for most women. Mothers start looking for flextime so they can be home when their kids get out of school, or have to spend more time with sick children. And it would be interesting, at this point, if you did an internet search on complaints about "workers who are parents" getting more time off than childless workers, particularly during inclement weather. Guess what? It usually isn't the father getting that time off.

And as this article points out:

According to U.S. Bureau of the Census and Bureau of Labor Statistics data, men consistently log more work activity than women, regardless of educational level. In the aggregate, however, women are actually earning more per hour than men.

Heck, one thing not broached in this whole issue is the non-wage compensation. If women get the same health and retirement benefits for less hours, that tilts the whole ball of wax even more in their favor!

But don't take my word for it, look into it on your own. You can continue to swallow the lie whole, or you can educate yourself. Two of the references below are lists of search results. The truth is out there. Will you take the red pill or the blue pill? [okay, that's enough pop-culture references for one day--ed.]
You can make nearly any case you want by citing the "right" statistics. So as you read articles about the "pay gap", pay attention to what the writer leaves out; that's often far more revealing.

Source 1
Source 2
Source 3

Auto-Submitter-Seo By Mr.php ==> ashq7a@att.net

ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ
ÌÇÊ
ÔÇÊ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÌÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÌÇÊ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÌÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞíå
ÌÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ãæÓæÚå ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ãæÓæÚÉ ÔåÑÒÇÏ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíå
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞíå
ßíãÒÑ
ÞíãÒÑ
gamezer
ÏæÑå ÇÍÊÑÇÝ ÇÎÊÑÇÞ ÇáãæÇÞÚ æÇáãäÊÏíÇÊ
ÏæÑå ÇÍÊÑÇÝ ÇÎÊÑÇÞ ÇáãæÇÞÚ æÇáãäÊÏíÇÊ
ÈÑÇãÌ åßÑ
ÈÑÇãÌ ÇÎÊÑÇÞ
ÇÈÑÇÌ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞíå
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ 100
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ ÑæãÇäÓíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíå
ÚÑÇÞ
ÚÑÇÞíÉ
Ïáíá ÇáãæÇÞÚ ÇáÚÑÇÞíÉ
IraqI Directory
Iraqi CHat
ÚÑÇÞ ÇÈ
ÚÑÇÞ ÇÈ
ÚÑÇÞ ÇÈ
ãæÓæÚå ÔåÑÒÇÏ
ãÑßÒ ÊÍãíá ÕæÑ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ÝÏíæ
ÇÛÇäí ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÇáÚÇÈ
ÇáÚÇÈ ÝáÇÔ
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞíÉ
]v]am uvhrdm
äÊÇÆÌ ÇáÓÇÏÓ 2011
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÚÑÇÞäÇ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞäÇ
ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞäÇ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ ÔÇÊ ÚÑÇÞí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ãÕÑíÉ ÔÇÊ ãÕÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÌÒÇÆÑíÉ ÔÇÊ ÌÒÇÆÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇÑÏäíÉ ÔÇÊ ÇÑÏäí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ßæíÊíÉ ÔÇÊ ßæíÊí
ÏÑÏÔÉ áíÈíÉ ÔÇÊ áíÈí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ãÛÑÈíÉ ÔÇÊ ãÛÑÈí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚãÇäíÉ ÔÇÊ ÚãÇäí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÞØÑíÉ ÔÇÊ ÞØÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓæÏÇäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓæÑíÉ ÔÇÊ ÓæÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÊæäÓíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇãÇÑÇÊíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ íãäíÉ ÔÇÊ íãäí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓÚæÏíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÈÍÑíäíÉ ÔÇÊ ÈÍÑíäí
ãæÓæÚÉ ÇáÎáíÌ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓÚæÏíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÓÚæÏí
ÏÑÏÔÉ áíÈíÉ
ÔÇÊ áíÈí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇãÇÑÇÊíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÇãÇÑÇÊí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÈÍÑíäíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÈÍÑíäí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ãÕÑíÉ
ÔÇÊ ãÕÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚãÇäíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÚãÇäí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓæÑíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÓæÑí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÞØÑíÉ
ÔÇÊ ÞØÑí
ÏÑÏÔå ßæíÊíÉ
ÏÑÏÔå ÝáÓØíäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáäÌÝ
ÔÇÊ ÔåÑÒÇÏ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÚãÇÑÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ Ïåæß
ÏÑÏÔå ÇÑÈíá
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÍáÉ
ÏÑÏÔå ÇáÇäÈÇÑ
ÏÑÏÔå ÚÑÇÞäÇ
ÏÑÏÔå ÇáÓãÇæÉ
ÏÑÏÔå ÇáÈÕÑÉ
ÚÑÇÞ3
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÍáÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÚÑÇÞ3
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÓáíãÇäíÉ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÇäÈÇÑ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáÑãÇÏí
ÏÑÏÔÉ ßÑÈáÇÁ
ÏÑÏÔÉ ÇáäÇÕÑíÉ
ãæÞÚ ãÕØÝì ÇáÚÑÇÞí
ãÑßÒ ÊÍãíá
ÇÓÊÖÇÝÉ ÚÑÇÞíÉ
ÈæÇÈÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞ
ãäÊÏì

Auto-Submitter-Seo By Mr.php ==> ashq7a@att.net

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments

« Hide Comments