This is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. The writer has zero grounding in anything approaching reality. It's a collection of unsupported assertions designed to explain away the fact that the Democrats' platform is not supported by even a plurality of citizens, and is slowly losing support.
Something occurred to me today at work. I wasn't 100% clear in my post about the Democrats unforced error.
See, I don't think the flags getting left behind say anything about Democratic Party patriotism, or Obama's ability to lead.
But while I won't go so far as to say "perception is reality", I will insist that perception matters.
Like it or not, Democrats have a perception problem.
There is a perception that Democrats don't love America for what it is, they love it for what it could be. There is a perception that when America is attacked by terrorists or criticized by Europeans, Democrats (and/or liberals) respond by wondering what we did wrong, rather than thinking maybe we're resented because we're right and a great nation. There is a perception that Democrats think Europe and socialism are just swell, and they want to make the US exactly like Belgium and/or Sweden.
Republicans take advantage of this perception to make Democrats appear less patriotic.
Democrats often make things easier on Republicans who want to do that. Such as refusing to wear a flag lapel pin after 9/11 (or even now) because it might be perceived as too jingoistic. They come up with terms like "flyover country." They make disparaging cracks about non-urban dwellers who "cling" to guns and religion.
Democrats forget two things:
1) Due to the balance between population and geography built into our Constitution (brilliantly, by the way), Montana and Wyoming have just as many Senators as California and New York.
2) There isn't quite enough population in the urban areas like San Francisco, Seattle/Portland, Chicago, New York, and D.C. to get elected President. So Democrats condescend to and disparage the people they need to win elections. They claim to be the party of the "little guy", the worker, the lower income...but only as long as they vote and are not heard.
How else do you explain liberal and/or Democrat disdain (if not hatred) for Wal-Mart? That's the middle-class store of choice.
So the flag thing was an error, plain and simple. Call it an error of not making a smart decision in dealing with unused flags. I think it far more likely that it was an error of someone not paying attention to details, or fulfilling their responsibility.
Because all spin aside, they flags were "in and around" trash dumpsters, and they sat there for one week and one day before anyone even picked them up. There's no possible way that can be considered theft, or dishonest.
Now, is it right that this hurts public perception of Democrats? [shrug]
As was pointed out, one under-emphasized aspect of a political campaign is it demonstrates the organizational and performance skills of your administration.
Like it or not, the American flag (and these were good-quality, cloth flags here) is seen as an extremely important symbol of the United States to a huge number of its citizens. Being careless of it would be like someone tearing up all your family pictures, and then saying, "Eh, it's nothing! I didn't hurt your family! Those pictures don't represent your family in any way, it's just pixels on paper! What, are you some yokel who thinks photographs capture your soul or something?!?!? What a rube!"
But in any case, like it or not (again), perception does matter. This was a blunder. Democrats are attempting to minimize the damage with spin, but I don't think it was very effective. And it was not a blunder that was caused by trying to do anything to Republicans, or prevent Republicans from gaining ground or anything. It was a complete mistake.
Go read that. I saw the original transcript, and Obama isn't trying to shift the battle to a basketball court. He was asked a question by someone in the audience, and I thought that in that sort of context, his answer was very good, very human, and not arrogant at all.
Look, people, there's enough stupid stuff going on, like Obama and his campaign ignoring Sarah Palin's successes as governor of the largest single geographical space in the US to label her as just being a mayor of a small town. She actually accomplished quite a bit as Alaska's governor, whereas Obama has spent most of his Senate career to date campaigning for President. When he hasn't been campaigning, he's been avoiding taking any stand that could hurt him politically (and that goes back to his Illinois congressional days).
So do we really need to distort what Obama said about basketball? No.
The Good:
Brandon Albert started and played well, nailing down the left side pretty well.
Glenn Dorsey created pressure up the middle.
Brandon Flowers played like a vet, not like a rookie in his first start. He's playing like a top-10 pick.
If you're scoring at home, that's 3 rookies in their first NFL game that played like veterans.
McBride got some pressure from the right side, nearly getting a sack.
The Chiefs converted 8/16 (50%) 3rd downs.
Brodie Croyle didn't turn the ball over, and displayed good decision-making, good touch, and good strength on his throws.
The Bad:
All sorts of pressure came from the right side as McIntosh struggled in pass coverage.
Bowe had at least four drops at key moments that could have turned the game for us.
Brodie went out of the game with a shoulder injury.
Neither the running game or the passing game could get any momentum.
The Ugly:
LJ had just over 3 yards/carry; part of this is that the Pats weren't scared of our WRs, knowing they could rotate coverage to Bowe and Gonzalez and not worry about our #2/3 WRs. And it worked, until Darling finally made a big catch near the end of the game.
We lost on the road despite winning the turnover battle, the time of possession battle, and having the Patriots run 3 plays from inside their own 1-yard line.
Reasons for optimism:
Even without Brady, the Patriots have lots of weapons, with 3 pro-bowlers on their line, Wes Walker, Randy Moss, a decent stable of RBs, and a good defense. Yet we still almost beat them on their field, despite the number of rookies and 2nd year players getting significant playing time.
This may well be the best defense we face all season, or at least the one that matches up best against us. Our offense should do better next week.
Reasons for pessimism:
We caught a break when Brady went out of the game, but still couldn't win.
We took 4 shots at the end zone from the 5 yard line, and couldn't gain a single yard.
We had the Patriots on 3rd and 11 just one foot from their own goal line, and let them get a 51-yard pass play that kept a TD drive alive.
Key takeaways: Our young players got lots of experience in this game, and it will pay off this season in improved performance. We stopped Tom Brady on his first two drives before he went out with an injury, and that isn't easy to do. We came within 5 yards of beating the Patriots on their home turf. This team will end up 10-6 or 11-5...but with 3 losses in their first 5 games.
If this catches on, it will undermine all the work Obama and Democrat politicians have done to try and convince people they love America.
In the comments, Mr Lady points to one possible explanation. Plausible, but not definitive, as I explain in my reaction.
But if you go back to the original link, and follow the links there, you find this:
The person claims the majority of the bags with flags in them were near the trash, on a dock, and would have been thrown away. The person thinks it was probably an “oversight” by the Democrats rather than any nefarious plot against the flag. But the person doesn’t believe anyone was coming to get them: “The flags were there for a week and a day and no one came looking for them.”
Caution, someone may try to claim these pictures are of the flags. Nope. It's the flags in the picture I posted.
Now, I'm sure it is an oversight, not a planned dis of the nation's symbol.
However, as I say in the comments, my military experience makes me take such symbols very seriously, and there is no more important symbol of the United States than the flag. Seriously.
It probably doesn't matter as much to enough of the rest of the US to make a difference, though.
Again, it will be interesting to see how it plays out...and if it even gets mentioned by Newsweek, CNN, the NYTimes; and if so, what spin gets put on it by them.
My business is making assessments of what is really going on behind foreign govt smokescreens. And in this case, if the Republicans stole the flags, I expect to see theft charges made. Failure to make any charges will be a strong (though not definitive) indication that the flags were going to be thrown out.
Final Update:
From the Hot Air post's comments:
Remember we’re not just electing one person or two, we’re choosing an administration. The people that Obama associates with will be giving positions of authority and power over us in the new administration. We have to judge not just Obama’s actions, we also have to judge the actions of those around him.
Yeah, whatever. This is sort of a ridiculous thing to get one's panties in a knot about, don't you think? I suppose they could have left them laying all over the streets of Denver where they were thrown by the conventioneers.
You know, it was Denver citizens in charge of cleanup, NOT the DNC. Just saying.
Well, that's the thing about conservatives:
1) Tradition and respect are important to preserve
2) Symbols do have significance
There is a proper way to dispose of a flag; this ain't it. Denver citizens might have been in charge of cleanup...but who made the decision to be so careful with recyclables? That wasn't a Denver citizen, that was the Democrats, and they weren't that careful with the symbol of the United States of America.
...now, you see it as no big deal, and that's a valid viewpoint. If you don't invest meaning in a symbol, it has no meaning. I'm military, and so maybe symbols mean more to me than the average person, but I do think symbols mean enough to the average person that this will hurt Democrats...if this becomes common knowledge. It comes down to: are we moving more liberal, or more conservative? I still think we are moving more conservative (on abortion, guns, taxes, race, and defense are all winning issues for conservatives; evidence: Democrats can't flat-out say what they mean on these issues, they have to use euphemisms to explain their position), and this will cost the Democrats votes.
If I thought there were any credibility at all to this story, yeah, I would've been disappointed. But, um...doesn't it seem ODD that they carefully separated all of the flags from the rest of the trash, wrapped them in their own bags, and then stored them all together?
It does, because they weren't being tossed. They were being re-used, and were taken and used as a smear campaign by oh, you go ahead and guess. I'll find the link.
I don't mean to growl. You know I loves you. But I know you can see through this stuff.
Well, actually, I can't always see through this stuff.
I have no problems admitting I'm wrong when I'm wrong, though.
Still, the site you linked isn't proof by any means; is everything put into garbage bags intended for re-use? Of course not.
Now, if some Republicans stole them and then made this claim, that is pretty despicable. To confirm/finalize that storyline, the DNC should charge them with theft.
12k flags is worth quite a bit; it might get close to felony levels. You know it would be a political move to get a theft conviction on this.
But if they don't press theft charges, that is a good indication that the opposite spin is more likely closer to the truth.
They won't charge them with theft because the DNC are a bunch of pussies who still think they have to take the moral highground and turn the other cheek. And they may loose the election because of that. If they spent 10 minute with their claws out, they could clobber the RNC right now. They won't do it. And it's pissing me off, honestly.
Either way, everything that is separated, put into separate, individual trash bags and stored together IS typical about to get recycled. I keep all my recycling in trash bags in my garage separated by what it is. If there had been a water bottle, or and ice cream cone, or a dirty diaper in one of those bags, MAYBE you'd have an argument. This is pretty obviously bad sportsmanship. THERE'S a shock.
She asks, "What's the content?" (video after the jump)
Well, here's what I got out of it: McCain now expects to win. He is so confident that he will win now that he's trying to establish coattails. Maybe it's actually Palin's skirttails, but in any case, he's not just going after Obama now, he's trying to flip leadership in Congress...or at least reduce Democratic majority.
The direct text is nothing special. The indirect message is pretty powerful, in my opinion.
All Republicans have to do is win the conservative vote to win the Presidential election.
Republicans no longer have to court Democrats to get enough.
We are now pretty much at least a 51% conservative (not Republican, mind you) nation. Maybe higher.
That's what all the churn about Palin is about. McCain got the conservatives on his side, and will win the Presidency now (barring a major miscue that allows the Democrat-supporting media to de-legitimize* either or both Republican nominees, a la Dan Quayle).
*and before you bring up Swift-Boating, let me point out that Kerry never released the information he has that purportedly proves the Swift-Boaters wrong. Thus, Kerry protests to the contrary, his actions admit they are telling the truth.
The problem for Democrats is they keep nominating non-legitimate candidates based Cargo Cult aping of Republican success, or identity politics, or both...
Fendi On Sale provide Louis Vuitton Handbags,Fendi Handbags,Gucci Handbags,UGG Shoes informaton,
Burberry On Sale provide information about Fashion brand about Gucci,Ugg ,Chanel and Louis Vuitton,
Clarks On Sale ,Converse On Sale tell you about Converse Shoes,UGG Shoes,Gucci Shoes and Handbags Information,
Dansko On Sale have Ugg Shoes,Louis Vuitton Handbags ,Gucci Shoes On Sale,
Discount Converse is dedicate in Converse Shoes,UGG Shoes,Gucci Shoes ,Louis Vuitton Information,
Fossil On Sale has Ugg Shoes,Louis Vuitton Handbags ,Gucci Shoes On Sale,
Frye Shop , Frye Store is a Fashion World about most fashionable brands like Louis Vuitton,Gucci,Chanel And UGG Shoes,
Heelys Sale have News about Gucci Shoes,UGG Shoes and Louis Vuitton.
Prada Handbags ,Keen On Sale , Lacoste on sale and
MBT On Sale provide you Louis Vuitton Handbags,Gucci Handbags informaton,
Miu Miu Store , New Balance On Sale are for Shoes And Handbags Fashion,
Prada On Sale provides Prada Shoes,Gucci Shoes,Louis Vuitton Handbags,Gucci Handbags information,
Prada Sell is a blog About gucci shoes,gucci jewelry,gucci handbags and other fashion informatoin,
Stuart Weitzman Store , The North Face On Sale ,
Cheap Gucci Shoes provide News About Cheap Gucci Shoes and Discount Gucci Men Shoes
Replica handbags also provides you news about Replica handbags,Replica Wallets,Replica Shoes,Replica Tiffany,Replica Louis Vuitton, Gucci Shoes is a site About gucci shoes,gucci jewelry,gucci handbags and other gucci fashion informatoin,
Discount Handbags Including Louis Vuitton Handbags,Gucci Handbags and Chanel Handbags,
Best Designer Handbags Guide you To Buy Designer Handbags,
Shoes Design provide Louis Vuitton Handbags ,Gucci Shoes On Sale,
Shoes fashion including Gucci Shoes,UGG Shoes and Louis Vuitton Handbags Fashion,
Handbags Fashion supply Gucci Handbags and Louis Vuitton Handbags,
Footwear collection , Jewelry Trends says Tiffany Jewelry,Louis Vuitton and Gucci Shoes.
Fashion World says most fashionable brands like Louis Vuitton,Gucci,Chanel,Gucci Shoes World talks about News about Gucci Shoes,Ugg shoes.
Find Ugg information at Ugg Boots News , Chanel Jewelry Shopping for Chanel Jewelry and Gucci Jewelry, Jewelry Brands is the best place to comparison blog for Jewelry Brands.
From Uk Tiffany Jewellery ,you can get how to Pick the Tiffany Jewellery, Tiffany World is heading for Tiffany Jewellery Web site Comparing. Sunglasses and Share jewelry
Fashion World says Handbags,Shoes and Jewelry fashion style. Find Latest Fashion about Lv,Gucci,Tiffany,Chanel. Tiffany Jewelry is a Tiffany Jewelry & Jewellery Guide Blog, Louis Vuitton online blog for most valueable information, Handbags Mall tells about louis vuitton handbags,Gucci handbags,.etc.
Someone mentioned Hillary Clinton's, "No way. No How. No McCain."
That reminded me of how horribly wooden Clinton is. I know some say she gave a good speech the other night, but in my opinion, she is a horrible speaker. Atrocious.
That line, for example, sounded like a high school drama class attempt to act. By a freshman.
And, not her fault, but her voice really stinks. It tends to rasp and grate, so you can tell she got a voice coach. But now, when she pitches her voice to carry (like she did in that line), she drones.
Bob Dole was a bad speaker with a bad voice, too. George W. Bush is a bad speaker with a pretty decent voice. The point is, you have to just speak and let the microphone do the work. Clinton can't, or won't (because of how bad her voice sounds when she speaks normally). It sucks that we demand certain aspects from our elected officials that don't have a direct relationship to governance, but Hillary Clinton lacks this key aspect. She'll never be POTUS.
Palin, on the other hand, is a good (not great) natural speaker. She has a nice voice, and she let the microphone work for her.
Well, as has been said many times, this is nothing new.
It goes back to McCain's military service meaning nothing, but Kerry's making him a better choice for the job than Bush, after Clinton's lack of service meant nothing when Clinton was running against the elder Bush and Dole. It goes back to ignoring Senator Byrd's history as a racist (among many others), yet never relinquishing attacks against Strom Thurmond and Trent Lott as racist (among many others). It goes back to denouncing Rice, Powell, Steele, and Thomas (among many others) as not really being black, simply because they are Republican (-leaning). It goes back to abandoning the self-descriptive of "progressive" for the world "liberal" when people figured out what progressive meant, then abandoning "liberal" when people figured out it meant the same thing as "progressive" (trying to fool people with words). It goes back to playing the same word games over abortion, too.
Simply put, Democrats want power. They don't care how they get it, really. They will use all sorts of concealing terms and word games to hide who they are and what they stand for, they promise all sorts of magic dreams to single issue voters to build support, they make extravagant promises of government assistance and pork to buy votes, all so that they can enact an (elitist) agenda they know that the majority of the US will not, and would not ever, agree to. To be fair, they truly believe that once enacted, a majority of Americans will be pleased with the result...but they have no qualms about using any verbal or political tactic to get the votes to enact it over the current objections of the majority.
So attacking Palin because she is an effective conservative spokesman is par for the course.
Man, there's just too much to link in order to make my points.
So let me just say this:
Republicans are not as sexist as left-leaning pundits think we are. Palin is popular because she has conservative credentials. It has very little to do with her gender (although some feminist-leaning Republicans are certainly into that aspect). She would have been a great pick, regardless of her gender.
See, I don't know about Democrats, but Republicans I know actually pay pretty close attention to politics. Democrats, in trying to be Big Tent (so as to get more votes, I think), have lots and lots and lots and lots of single-issue voters who don't pay attention to the needs of other single-issue voters. Blacks and Hispanics hate each other politically. We just saw the rift between feminists and blacks play out between Obama and Clinton, right? Abortion on demand is just a silly concept to the gay rights groups. If Democrats have a unifying theme, it is that they represent the assumptions and condescension (although often not the actual needs) of urban, upper-middle class whites.
Here's a good example of the Democrat prejudice at work. He absolutely doesn't get Republicans. That's not really a bad thing for us, of course. We get lots and lots and lots of mileage from left-leaning pundits not understanding how we think and why we vote. Which results in lots of Cargo Cult-like aping of conservative stances like the "Strong and Tough" pretense a few years back, and the Kerry War Hero bid that directly lost the last election.
See, conservatives (and to be honest, there is only an indirect connection between conservative voters and Republican politicians) have a unifying political concept that underlies everything we vote for:
Individualism. We believe in individual responsibility, individual accomplishments, individual failures, getting to enjoy the fruits of your individual successes and paying the price for your individual failures. That means we tend to reject identity politics that looks only at group identifiers like gender or skin color. As a result, even though we do/say things that left-leaning pundits/voters can only understand as racism, we are actually far less racist than Democrats. We see people as people. We reject Obama as being an inexperienced smooth-talker, regardless of his race. We reject Hillary Clinton as a shrill scold, regardless of her gender. We believe things like, if one person can succeed from bad circumstances, anyone can. We believe in teaching to fish, not giving a lifetime of fishes. We do not believe, like Democrats apparently do, that identity is destiny.
Another thing that Palin's performance and reception shows me is that Democrats are in big trouble, politically. Conservativism is growing in power and acceptance. Please note, conservativism, not the Republican Party. Like I said, there is only an indirect connection between the two.
In fact, there wasn't a single conservative in the field for the Republicans this election cycle. The closest was Fred Thompson, who wasn't really a conservative, but adopted the mantle of Champion of Conservative Values, with the intent to use his acting/speaking ability to articulate our political views.
Heck, as much as I like and support him, George W. Bush isn't really a conservative. He is a conservative on foreign policy issues, but doesn't get much credit for it because he can't articulate why he makes the decisions he does.
In any case, Sarah Palin represents a true "pro-life, pro-personal gun ownership, spending cuts, increased energy production, personal-responsibility, self-growth, truly representing your constituents" political philosophy. She's going to be very successful in the Republican party because of it, and it will drive Democrats nuts.
Okay, I think we're back to pretty good again. I'm getting a little bit more mature, and I definitely understand her much more, and understand where she's coming from much more, and that makes it much easier for me to ignore the b.s. and savor the good stuff/times.
Still More Thoughts Related to the Gender Wars
«
Social Issues
»
The quite-possibly insulting aspect of all this to males is that women have the assumption that the only way a man won't be willing is if he already has someone better looking and/or younger...and even if he does, he probably is still open for some action on the side.
I was totally going to puke some moral outrage all over your comments box, but then I got to thinking that maybe, just maybe, you're right.
I think most women do assume that most men would, well, YOU know, given the opportunity, regardless of the reasons not too. I don't think we're entirely to blame for that opinion, either. Doesn't make it right, though.
I also think that women are still not really allowed to be "forward" and that if we are, it's looked upon as cheap. Which is really, really not right.
Part of the reason women don't work on pick-up lines is because (I think) most women have the assumption going in that men will find them attractive...or at least be willing. The trick for women, then, is how to just signal that one male that she is open to an advance.
I'm Getting Dang Excited About the Upcoming NFL Season
«
Kansas City Chiefs
»
Points:
1) We decide to test our passing against Chicago. We are successful, converting several 3rd-and-longs with our 1st team, and doing a great job in pass protection, even with Albert out with an injury.
2) We decide to test our running against Arizona. We are successful, with one series we got 9, 18, 15, and 4 yds on consecutive running plays.
3) We faced perhaps the best receiving tandem in the league with Fitz and Boldin. How many catches did Boldin get? Oh, yeah: ZERO. Fitz got his catches...but none looked easy; he was not allowed much YAC on any one of 'em (if I recall correctly). He was covered on each of his catches, just not smothered. NFL-level QBs and NFL-level WRs against NFL-level CBs pretty much always look like that. Our guys didn't look overmatched, and Fitz didn't look like a pro-bowler...just like a dang good WR going against a pretty good CB...and that was even against our 5th round rookie, Carr. More experience (by mid-season, say), and we win half those battles we lost.
4) Turk McBride has stepped it up. He looked good. Dorsey got double-teamed from his very first NFL snap. McBride is causing problems from the LDE position, and if he keeps it up, will require double teams. Tyler has drawn double-teams when Dorsey wasn't in during practice...if he improves with game-time experience (as I expect), he'll wreak havoc if not double-teamed...all this should mean good things for Hali once the season starts and he has a whole game to work against a LT.
5) LJ is running like a beast, and we've got a full stable of RBs to make sure he doesn't get overworked
6) Bowe is Bowe. TG is TG. They both make plays on their own, meaning: they don't need a Pro-Bowl QB putting the ball in exactly the right spot to make the catch; either of them can go up and get the ball, take it away from a would-be interceptor. And now Franklin is emerging as a playmaker
7) Our starting O-line isn't giving Croyle tons of time, but they are giving him enough time.
8) Brodie? ZERO picks to date.
...and we've still got two more preseason games for our rookies to improve, and to tweak the roster to make sure we have the best people.
This is going to be a good year, folks, we're going to surprise people.
I said "11-5, barring a significant player (LJ, Bowe, Croyle, DJ, Albert) missing significant time". It was a reckless prediction, but watching a 2nd pre-season game makes me feel we will be in the 10-6 to 11-5 range. If everything breaks right and we have no injuries, we'll be 11-5. We'll be 10-6 if there are no significant injuries but we don't get the right breaks in a close game.
Folks, we *do* need some luck to have a great season. But 8-8 is aiming too low for this group.
The juxtaposition of these two articles is puzzling, to say the least. I guess I'd believe the one where government budgets will be affected, rather than the one where individual budgets will penalized.
Last year, we had a youth movement started.
We were careful to sign FAs of less than 28 years of age, only (except for DE).
We got the best LT on the market we could get without over-paying, and that LT wasn't all that good; just average.
From the very beginning of the season, we had an undrafted rookie nickel back. We had an undrafted rookie as our backup MLB. We tried to give our 2nd year QB the starting job.
Our offense was horrible from the start. We couldn't get the offense going most of the time. It would disappear for an entire half of the game. Our #1 WR was injured almost from the very first play of the season. Huard throws tons of INTs. LJ struggles to find room to run, gets hit behind the line constantly.
But by midseason, we were 4-4, and had battled back from an 0-2 start. LJ was starting to get 100-yd games. Huard was getting beat up behind a porous line. Bowe stepped up and took over the #1 WR position, but was still raw/inexperienced enough to get shut down in games. Defenses stacked the box, knowing that they could smother LJ if it was a run, but the same play call would allow them to get pressure on Huard before he could deliver the ball if it was a pass. Huard got dinged up, bruised and battered. No WR stepped up to be a good #2 if Bowe and TG were covered. Our new, young DL players hadn't caught on yet. Our MLB was often out of posiiton. Our #1 CB had to give a huge cushion to avoid getting burnt deep, and had pretty much lost his ability to stop the run.
But we were still 4-4, and had beat San Diego in San Diego.
Then LJ got hurt. Then Priest re-injured his neck. Then Huard couldn't move the ball anymore (and could barely walk, he was hit so much). Kolby Smith couldn't stay healthy and on the field. Gilbert Harris showed he wasn't an NFL starter. Jackie Battle showed he wasn't ready. Jeff Webb was inconsistent. Donnie Edwards couldn't stay healthy and on the field. Boone wore down. Croyle got hammered behind the same porous line.
We ended up 4-12.
But!
1) We still ended up in the top half on defense, including leading the league in forcing 3-and-outs
2) We significantly increased our quality depth at TE, RB, and WR
3) No matter how many mistakes Flowers might make, he represents a significant upgrade over Ty "Oops" Law
4) We likely increased our quality depth at CB and S...our starting NB has been pushed down the depth chart by increased talent on the roster
5) Tyler and McBride are showing significant improvement at DE and DT
6) LJ is not just back to health, he enacted a healthier eating/exercise plan that has made him stronger and faster than at any time in the last 18 months
7) We have a new OC who has clearly developed an effective O-plan, one that uses our strengths and will protect the QB
Our only downgrade on defense is losing Jared Allen. But the addition of Dorsey and the improvement of McBride and Tyler should end up in about equal pressure from the defense. I wouldn't be surprised if we end up getting the same number of sacks and FF as last year from the D-line as a group (about 25, I think, with 15.5 from JA and 7.5 from Hali last year, and a scattering from everyone else; 25 should be easy to get, with 11 from Hali, 3 from McBride, 3 from Tyler, 3 from Dorsey, and 5 from everyone else not being impossible). Demorrio Williams and DJ should increase the overall number of sacks from the LB, too (I think we had only about 10 total from them last year).
The only downgrade on offense is...well, we didn't downgrade anywhere on offense.
I think Albert will be at least as good as McIntosh was last year on the left. And the right should be better than Welbourn/Perry/Turley was last year...there's almost no way they could be as bad. Niswanger has already shown he's an upgrade over Weigmann, and Waters is playing better than last year.
Bowe won't be any worse, and likely has turned it up a notch. Webb is more consistent than last year, and has proven he deserves the #2 slot as a starter...but DvD and Price may have demonstrated to the coaches they have even more game than Webb. Franklin may even make an impact as a quality slot receiver (something we lacked last year).
Cottam will give us more options out of the 2 TE set.
We have QB roll-outs built in to help make things easier on the O-line.
We have what seems to be NFL-starter quality backups 4 deep at the RB position.
Page has already won several games for us at FS, but reports are he's playing even better this year. And while Pollard was inconsistant last year at SS, he has reportedly improved this off-season. And Morgan is faster and better in coverage than Pollard, yet a better tackler than Page, so will see significant playing time.
We have enough quality depth at most positions that our coaches will be able to set up substitution situations to minimize rookie mistakes.
One extra TD/game last year would have won an additional 4 games for us. And it would have put other games in reach, so that the other team couldn't go into a mode to protect a lead...meaning one extra TD/game would have meant a win against Green Bay, and maybe Jacksonville and Tennessee. Ifs and wishes, sure, but that's 11-5.
I predict that:
1) Our defense will not slide. We will be above average. We may still be around 13th/14th in yardage/scoring, but may slightly improve to just get in the top 10. We will not lead the league in forcing 3-and-outs again, but will be among the leaders for that, and for turnovers.
2) Our offense will get that one extra TD/game.
LJ and Cottam and Charles and improved-Croyle and DvD/Franklin/Price/improved-Webb pretty much guarantee that.
I'm going out on a limb and saying that: if we stay relatively healthy, we will go 11-5 this year.
But staying healthy isn't easy in the NFL. One injury to a key player that results in extensive missed time, and we go 8-8. Two, and we are 6-10.
Well, yeah, it probably won't help.
On other hand, I don't see how it could hurt, and it's cool to have a woman talk dirty to me, er, my blog and anyone who reads it...
The other half of the previous?
To be honest, I'm putting these here because I want to watch them, I don't have time now, and I can't guarantee I can find them again easily.
So here is the second:
Just What Kind of Blogger Am I, Anyway?
«
Blogging
»
To tell the truth, I hate blogging about politics.
I am very passionate about my political beliefs, but I’ve gotten to the point that I hate blogging about it. I recognize that when I put what I believe down on trons (can’t say “down on paper”, right?) that I am alienating anyone who doesn’t agree with me. Some of my favorite people are either slightly or strongly in opposition to my political views.
Aside from all that, I seem to get the most attention from the rest of the blogosphere when I write about other things than politics.
So why do I do it?
Well, sometimes I feel like I’m being unfair to my regular readers when I don’t post. As hard as it is to fathom, some people actually like to read what I’ve written. If I don’t post, people start worrying about me and stuff. And there’s nothing worse than not getting your free ice cream, right?
But there are a few things that appear to be coming together. The Chiefs are looking like they will be very, very interesting this year, if not very good (although I’m convinced they may surprise some people). So I’ll have quite a bit to write about there.
My involvement with Car Lust Blog also has me thinking (and therefore, writing) more and more about cars.
I have lots and lots of guitar stuff to write about…I’ve been considering starting a regular Guitar Lust feature (modeled after the Car Lust), and have started assembling lots of pictures for that. I was daunted by the idea of running out of guitars to talk about, and that too many were just: “Well, I’ve never played one and probably never will, but it’s *pretty*”. But you know what? Screw it. I’m going to start doing one Guitar Lust each week.
So this fall I think should be a fruitful time for this blog.
Hopefully, I’ll be able to avoid the politics that polarize.
…right after I post another political post, of course.
As much as your guitar posts make my girly bits all tingly, I really like your political posts. Just as with David, you and I couldn't be on further ends of the spectrum, but that's why I like you.
I know my opinion, and I don't need to read someone reiterating it for me. I'd much rather read a well, written, poised opposing view any day. It gives me something to think about, you know? I am all about hearing the other side of the argument.
Long comment to say this: Don't shy away from politics, especially now. Some of us are waiting for it.
I too tend to be very careful with politics and religion, lest I invite a whole bunch of hate-comments. And I'm one who would rather get along and agree to disagree than get nasty and confrontational. I tend to take such things personally. As far as you go, we seem to pretty much share common beliefs, but sometimes you bring a perspective that I'm not familiar with into the discussion, and that's what makes it interesting. Or something I'm totally in tune with so I can say "Cool! I'm not the only one that feels this way!" So keep on with whatever posts make you happy. The family stuff is good to hear too, even though I know things are a bit dicey now. Good news is always good.
My take:
What I really liked:
- On the roll-out pass to Cottam, Brodie had a *great* fake toss.
- On LJ's TD run, Brodie had *another* awesome fake toss...and then still handed it off to LJ. That changed the pursuit of the D, and meant LJ had less guys to beat to get in the end zone. That was a great call by Gailey.
- We won the game despite being -1 in the TO column. AND that was against one of the better defenses in the NFL. AND it was on the road.
- Brodie Croyle was 60% on his passing (the minimum you want from a pro-bowler) and had 8 yds/attempt. A pro-bowler is always above 6 yds/attempt, and usually above 7 yds/attempt.
- Brodie used both legs and arm and decision-making skills on the first drive to convert *four* third downs. Five if you count his execution of the fake toss-handoff to LJ for the score. That's big-league performance. Against a top defense, on the road. Can't say that enough.
HammerHead
