Charter Member of the Sub-Media

May 09, 2004

Reporting Facts is Inethical (UPDATED) « Media Distortions »

Thanks to Kevin for calling my attention to this piece by Kevin Paul. A different Kevin, I mean.

My first thought was: Maybe they should do another study to find out what erroneous views are held by watchers of other news outlets; for instance, that these other viewers might believe no evidence of WMD was found in Iraq (wrong: evidence's just that a definitive presence has not been established), that there is absolutely no connection between Iraq and terror (again, wrong: evidence's just that a definitive connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden has never been established, nor does it need to, because Saddam's connections to international terror organizations is undeniable; it's a media red herring to keep mentioning no connection has been drawn from Saddam to 9/11: no one is even looking!). So why doesn't someone look into the views of the average CNBC viewer?

UPDATE: Thanks to all the losers and trolls who have stopped by to leave totally stupid and immature comments. If your comment doesn't pass a 'basic intelligence' test, it will be edited. Using any sort of profanity in your comment is sure to get me to edit it, and the results won't make you look good.

Instead of spewing stupidity, why not try actually thinking for once? I know that's very difficult for liberal brats like you, and liberals tend to avoid difficult things, but you could do it if you tried.

Fact: Clear connections between Saddam and terror, including clear connnections between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Anyone who willfully refuses to recognize those facts will earn nothing but derision.

But then I realized that no one watches CNBC.

Posted by Nathan at 09:33 AM | Comments (6) | TrackBack (1)
» damnum absque injuria links with: Dog Trainer: If it Ain't Liberal Journalism, it Ain't Journalism

Well, it's on that other Kevin's blog but the post was by Paul.

Posted by: McGehee at May 9, 2004 11:21 AM

Oops. Heheh, yeah, you make that's just that Wizbang=Kevin in my mind, still.

Posted by: Nathan at May 9, 2004 03:33 PM

I don't have anything worthwhile to say.

Posted by: Whackly at July 21, 2005 08:36 AM

Yeah, i'm sure that there's plenty of evidence, but MoveOn, George Soros, etc just like looking like idiots for ignoring clear of 'evidence', since the traitorous press that sides with terrorists won't show the truth.

Maybe liberal idiots will grow a brain someday...but I doubt it.

Posted by: Hot Carl at July 21, 2005 08:57 AM

Anyone who doesn't recognize that there is a clear connection between Saddam Hussein and terror is a complete idiot and a total oxygen thief.

Posted by: whackly at July 22, 2005 07:18 AM

also... "whackly" is not a word

Posted by: Whackly at July 22, 2005 07:21 AM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?