Tell me: is there anything in this that I didn't already say here two days earlier? Did Rand say it better? Was his article organized better?
Maybe I'm just stuffed with my own ego, but I don't think so.
Bottom line: we don't need Law. What we've got is good enough for four games, especially considering an improved front 7 that should help protect. Law may not be 100% for those first 4 games anyway. But it never hurts to improve depth if you can get it at a good price.
Maybe that's obvious. But I said it 48 hours before the professional did.
I noticed that this morning. It seems Rand is stalking you. Lord knows he can't come up with anything good on his own.
I miss Ivan Carter.
Did you get a chance to check this out? Hilarious.
http://www.bangcartoon.com/broncobilly.htm
810 WHB in KC just had an interview with Law. What a joke. The guy is exactly as you stated. Overly inflated sense of self importance, or conceited SOB.
He said the Chiefs were on his back burner. Can't afford him.
Basically, it's all about the money. We both know that but to him it's like, everything.
Team player he is not.
Posted by: Warpaint at July 14, 2005 01:01 PMI didn't have sound on my computer when you first linked the broncobilly cartoon, and I forgot to check out it when I got on a puter with sound. I'll check it out later today.
I miss Ivan Carter, too. I could really use him as my eyes at the training camp. [sigh]
Posted by: Nathan at July 14, 2005 05:11 PM
Prev | List | Random | Next Powered by RingSurf! |
Pagerank |
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |