Charter Member of the Sub-Media

January 25, 2005

Say Hello To My Little Rule « The Brain Fertilizer Way »

I have made a point of totally discounting anyone who uses the phrase "Speaking Truth to Power" as a near-complete socio-political idiot.

Let's see how that's working for me, shall we?

Great Moments in Higher Education* Here's an interesting angle on the Larry Summers kerfuffle. The Santa Cruz (Calif.) Sentinel notes that one of the Harvard president's harshest foes is Denice Dee Denton, the new chancellor of the University of California at Santa Cruz:
Denton is making headlines . . . for challenging controversial statements made by Harvard University President Larry Summers, who suggested that innate differences between the sexes could help explain why fewer women succeed in science and math careers.

Summers made the comments . . . at an economic conference attended by Denton. Denton questioned Summers sharply during the conference, saying she needed to "speak truth to power." She told the Harvard president that she believed his assertions had been contradicted by research materials presented at the conference.

The Sentinel reports that the alliterative administrator has taken a very personal interest in the advancement of female scientists:

The University of California created a $192,000-a-year job for the partner of the new UC Santa Cruz chancellor, a move that is being criticized by employee unions. . . .

UC officials defended hiring Gretchen Kalonji, the longtime partner of incoming Santa Cruz Chancellor Denice Dee Denton. They described Kalonji as a highly qualified professor who will be an asset in her new job as director of international strategy development.

Kalonji, a professor of materials science at the University of Washington in Seattle and an expert in international education, also is getting a tenured professorship, perhaps at UCSC.

In case the meaning isn't clear, that's "partner" as in a Boston marriage. A Sentinel editorial takes the unions' side, saying UC owes "a public accounting of why this job is so important," and noting: "So far as we can figure out, UCSC has never had a 'director of international development,' and a reasonable person would ask why that's so important now."

Yep, it was 100% in this case, too. Advantage: Brain Fertilizer!

*From the 25 January 2005 edition of Best of the Web. Click through to there to follow the embedded links Mr. Taranto provides.

Posted by Nathan at 02:28 PM | Comments (4)
Comments

Nepotism/favoritism sucks. I'll never forget when our fixed ops manager had an affair with an admin assistant...his wife fell apart. So, the company created a job (that had never existed before) for his wife, gave her the office next to his, and installed a WINDOW inbetween the two offices so she could keep an eye on him. She got PAID to sit and watch the husband who earns six digits.

I got a .25 raise that year.

Posted by: Jo at January 25, 2005 03:15 PM

After high school ended I left (fled) Santa Cruz because of the very reasons Ms. Denton is able to say and do as she pleases. If you lean right, you're always wrong. If you lean left, anything you say (i.e. "speak truth to power"), or anything you do (Nepotism, wasting Taxpayer/University funds, etc), no matter how idiotic or self-serving they may be, is allowed and defended because... (add your favorite liberal excuse here). Trust me, I've heard them all.

Every story I ever hear coming out of Santa Cruz usually falls under the 'Laughable Cook Fringe' page of a News Paper.

It's sad that such a beautiful coastal town is full of people who prefer admiring their so-called intellect instead of admiring great waves, prestine bay, and giant redwood groves. Evolution may be preached in that town, but it has yet to take effect.

Posted by: Tony at January 26, 2005 10:15 AM

Jo, that guy must have been a huge asset (or at least 60% of one) to the company if they were willing to spend that kind of money. I would sooner have fired the sum'bitch and/or quietly encouraged his wife to kick him out of the house and sue for a huge alimony (and child support?) regime.

Posted by: McGehee at January 26, 2005 11:07 AM

He was a year away from retirement, I often think that had a lot to do with it.

Posted by: Jo at January 26, 2005 02:35 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?