Charter Member of the Sub-Media

November 03, 2004

The Kerry Campaign Refuses to Concede? « Politics As Usual »

UPDATED: The article in the following link has changed. It formerly described Kerry's determination to fight in Ohio and refuse to concede. Now it describes Kerry's concession. FWIW.

It's official: The National-level Democrats would rather cut the baby in half. They care more for power than for the good of the nation. There is simply no other way to interpret this action on their part.

Posted by Nathan at 05:46 AM | Comments (5)
Comments

Wow. Reading that POS article you'd think Bush only got 3,500 votes more and not 3,500,000. Spin Spin Spin Spin Spin. Then again, what do you expect from the AP?

Posted by: Sharp as a Marble at November 3, 2004 06:04 AM

Not accuracy, apparently.

President Bush is the first President with an outright majority of the voting populace in 16 years!

Posted by: Nathan at November 3, 2004 06:11 AM

Why is it that CNN is the only state refusing to call Ohio?

FoxNews and MSNBC are both saying that Ohio is all but won, and that it is unlikely that a provisional ballot count will give Kerry a lead there.

Yet CNN still says, "its too close to call"

In other news, Dan Rather is on the verge of having a stroke.

Posted by: Jeremy at November 3, 2004 07:27 AM

I'm confused. Did they change the article you linked to?
The post and comments don't match the content of the article.

Posted by: Randy at November 3, 2004 09:13 AM

Yep, they changed it. The original article said that Kerry planned to continue fighting in Ohio and refused to concede.

Thanks for the heads' up!

Posted by: Nathan at November 3, 2004 09:18 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?